Trad. del árabe: María Luisa Prieto
Tengo la sabiduría del condenado a muerte:
No tengo cosas que me posean.
He escrito mi testamento con mi sangre:
“¡Confiad en el agua, moradores de mis canciones!”.
He dormido ensangrentado y coronado con mi mañana...
He soñado que el corazón de la tierra era mayor que
Su mapa
Y más claro que sus espejos y mi cadalso.
He creído que una nube blanca me
Ascendía,
Como si yo fuera una abubilla con el viento por alas.
Y al alba, la llamada del sereno
Me despierta de mi sueño y de mi lenguaje:
Vivirás en otro cadáver.
Modifica tu último testamento.
Se ha retrasado la fecha de la segunda ejecución.
¿Hasta cuándo?, pregunto.
Esperaré a que mueras más.
No tengo cosas que me posean, respondo,
He escrito mi testamento con mi sangre:
“¡Confiad en el agua,
moradores de mis canciones!”
Y yo, aunque fuera el último,
Encontraría las palabras suficientes...
Cada poema es un cuadro.
Pintaré ahora para las golondrinas
El mapa de la primavera,
para los que pasan por la acera, el azufaifo
y para las mujeres el lapislázuli...
El camino me llevará
Y yo le llevaré a hombros
Hasta que las cosas recobren su imagen
Verdadera,
Luego oiré lo genuino:
Cada poema es una madre
Que busca a su hijo en las nubes,
Cerca del pozo de agua.
“Hijo, te daré el relevo.
Estoy encinta”.
Cada poema es un sueño.
He soñado que soñaba.
Me llevará y le llevaré
Hasta que escriba la última línea
En el mármol de la tumba:
“Me he dormido para volar”.
Y llevaré al Mesías zapatos de invierno
Para que camine como los demás
Desde lo alto de la montaña hasta el lago.
(Publicado en el periódico Al-Hayat el 31-X-2003)
sábado, 21 de noviembre de 2009
domingo, 15 de noviembre de 2009
Noticias de Gush Shalom y un artículo de Uri Avnery
Gracias a Eduardo Mosches por el envío.
Ad in Ha'aretz, Nov. 13, 20 09
Netanyahu has come backFrom WashingtonWithout any worriesNO settlement freezeAnd thereforeNO partnerNO threat toThe Government coalition
weekly ads archive
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad
~~~
Uri Avnery
Scoundrel With PermissionWHEN THE TV news starts with a murder, people are relieved
Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
~~~
A MATTER OF LEGITIMACY
by Adam Keller and Beate Zilversmidt
Other countries may be able to remain contemptuous and uncaring when the world casts them in the role of a brutal Goliath, Israel just can't afford it
Read more ... http://toibillboard.info/144lead.htm
in 'The Other Israel' November online
~~~~
Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
מודעה ב"הארץ" 13 בנובםבר
נתניהו חזר מוושינגטון –אין לו עוד דאגות:אין הקפאת התנחלויותולכן גםאין שותף,אין איוםעל שלמות הקואליציה.
ארכיון צודעות: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad
~~~
אורי אבנרי
נבל ברשות התורהכאשר מהדורת החדשות בטלוויזיה נפתחת בידיעה על רצח, נושמים בישראל
טכסט מלא http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1258253168
ארכיון מאמרים http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
~~~
.
הבלוג של אדם : http://adam-keller1.blogspot.com
Uri Avnery14.11.09
Scoundrel With Permission
WHEN THE TV news starts with a murder, people are relieved.
This means that no war has broken out, no suicide bomb has exploded, no Qassam rocket has been launched at Sderot. Ahmadinejad has not test-fired a new missile that can reach Tel Aviv. Just another murder.
Not that Israel is the world’s murder capital. We shall have to work much harder to reach the heights of New York or Moscow, not to mention Johannesburg. Statistics even show our murder rate is declining.
But lately Israel has been shocked by a series of exceptionally brutal murders. A husband took revenge on his wife by killing his little daughter and burying her in a forest. A man who lived with the wife of his son killed her daughter, his own granddaughter, put her little body in a suitcase and threw it into Tel Aviv’s Yarkon river. A son who quarreled with his wife killed her and her mother, cut up both bodies and dispersed the parts in garbage bins. A young man who had a quarrel with his mother killed her, and then went off to kill his brother, too. A man in his 70s killed his wife in her sleep with a hammer.
In recent weeks, there were two cases that trumped even these atrocities.
Damian Karlik, an immigrant from Russia who worked as head waiter in a Russian restaurant, was dismissed for theft and decided to take revenge on the owners, Russian immigrants like him. He went to their apartment and stabbed to death six people, one after another – the owner and his wife, their son and his wife and their two small grandchildren.
An immigrant from the US called Jack Teitel, an inhabitant of one of the most extreme West Bank settlements, has now confessed to the killing some years ago of two random Palestinians. He returned briefly to America, and, after coming back, put bombs into police cars. Why? Because the police were protecting gays and lesbians. He is also suspected of killing two traffic policemen for the same reason. He also claimed responsibility for the mass killing of gays in a Tel Aviv club (though that may be empty bragging). He planted a bomb in the home of some Messianic Jews (Jews who regard Jesus as the Messiah) and grievously injured a 15-year-old. He tried to kill the leftist professor Ze’ev Sternhell with another bomb which wounded him.
WHAT IS so special about these two cases is that they involved new immigrants who were allowed into Israel in spite of already being under investigation for crimes in their homelands.
The Law of Return accords every Jew the right to immigrate (“make Aliyah”) to Israel, where he or she automatically receives Israeli citizenship on arrival. But even according to this law, the Minister of the Interior can reject people suspected of serious crimes.
This makes the case of Karlik especially interesting. He was suspected in Russia of armed robbery, but the organization in charge of issuing Israeli immigration permits in Russia asserts that they did not know about it.
This organization, Nativ (“path”), was active in the Soviet Union as one of the Israeli secret services, like the Mossad and Shin Bet. Its particular job was to infiltrate Jewish communities and induce Jews to come to Israel.
Apart from this, Nativ was also engaged, of course, in espionage. It is no secret that for decades immigrants arriving from the Soviet Union were interrogated exhaustively by the Shin Bet about military, economic and other installations in their former homeland. The precious information thus gathered ensured Israel a high standing in the Western intelligence community.
After the collapse of the Communist regime, Nativ was to be disbanded, but like every threatened organization it fought for its life. It was decided to leave it intact and put it in charge of immigration to Israel from all the former Soviet republics.
The religious credentials of the immigrants interest Nativ much more than any criminal record they may have. It seems Nativ has no contacts with the Russian police, who probably suspect it of other activities.
Thus it happens that a person like Karlik, a man under investigation for robbery with violence, was found suitable for immigration. His ethnic pedigree was impeccable. After his arrival in Israel, the Russian authorities officially applied for his extradition for robbery, but the request was denied. The escaped robber was issued a license for a gun and allowed to work as a guard.
Teitel’s case is similar. True, in the US there is no Nativ, but the logic of those in charge of emigration to Israel is the same: to bring immigrants without asking unnecessary questions. According to religious law, a Jew remains a Jew even if he sins.
THESE AFFAIRS shine a spotlight on one of the guiding principles of the Zionist establishment: to bring Jews to Israel, whatever the price. Statistics must show that this year – or any other year – a record number of Jews have “made Aliyah”. In many communities, the bottom of the barrel is scraped in order to bring more Jews. Emissaries find “lost tribes” of Jews in Peru and Ethiopia, India and China.
In this situation, there is an understandable temptation to overlook the criminal past of would-be immigrants. So what if somebody, a kosher Jew, has robbed a bank or mistreated children? In Israel he will perhaps mend his ways. Or if somebody was put on trial abroad for illegal arms deals, money laundering and/or selling blood-stained diamonds – he is welcome, and if he brings his millions with him, the leaders of the state will be happy to be photographed in his company.
That is true, of course, only for an immigrant who is a Jew according to the Halakha (religious law). If he is a Goy, the story is quite different. That is the province of the leader of the Shas party, Eli Yishai.
IN THE present Israeli government there are several candidates for the title of Racist in Chief. An objective jury would be hard put to choose between them.
The favorite is the Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, a certified racist whose entire career in Israel is built on hatred towards Arabs and foreigners. It was he who appointed as Minister of Justice the kippa-wearing lawyer Ya’akov Ne’eman, who is now busily engaged in securing the all-important position of Legal Advisor to the Government (practically the Attorney General) for a judge educated in a Yeshiva (Orthodox school), who lives in one of the more extreme settlements and who has become notorious for several rightist judgments. Binyamin Netanyahu himself, of course, is also an excellent candidate.
But the King of Racists is the Minister of the Interior. He is more dangerous than his colleagues because he has absolute power over the civil status of every person in Israel, immigration and emigration, the Register of Residents and the expulsion of foreigners. In this position he is now doing to foreigners what others have done to Jews in many countries. He is untiring in his efforts to guard the real Israel – not the “Jewish and democratic state” as it is officially defined, but rather the “Jewish and demographic state”. For this purpose he has recently created a special para-police force for the detection and deportation of illegal foreigners.
It is difficult to decide whether Yishai is an extreme fanatic or a complete cynic, or some strange combination. As matter of fact, when Shas was still a moderate party, in those distant days when its guru, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, ruled that it is permissible to give back the occupied territories, and its former leader, Aryeh Deri, was the darling of the left, Yishai, too, declared “Yes to Oslo, Yes to the evacuation of Jews from Hebron, Yes to Arafat!” But since then much dirty water has flowed down our polluted rivers, Shas has turned into a radical right-wing party and Yishai is now the most extreme rightist in the government.
His unshakable devotion to the purity of the race arouses admiration. Hardly a day passes without some shocking news about his activites. He fights like a tiger for the expulsion of 1500 children of foreign workers who were born in Israel, who speak Hebrew and attend Israeli schools, who have no other homeland. Yishai is ready to lay down his life for their deportation.
The Interior Ministry prevents the entry of American and European citizens who bear Arab names. Officials of the UN and the EU in charge of projects for the Palestinians are normally unable to enter from Jordan (or anywhere else outside Israel), and if they somehow do obtain permission – they are then forbidden to cross the Green Line into Israel. Foreign women married to Israelis are expelled without mercy. There is no end to the examples.
In the eyes of Yishai, every son of a Thai is an enemy of the Jewish state, every daughter of a Colombian worker is a threat to the purity of the Jewish people. He has declared that the foreign workers are an “infection”, and warned that Tel Aviv is “becoming Africa”. He has disclosed that the foreigners carry frightening diseases, such as AIDS, tuberculosis and such. (And in this respect they resemble gays and lesbians, who, according to Yishai, are “sick people”.
Such a person would not remain a minister in the cabinet of the US or most European countries. In the homeland of the Nuremberg laws he would not even come close to a government position.
Recently, during the operation “Cast Lead”, Yishai demanded that we “bomb thousands of houses, to destroy Gaza” – which does not hinder him from denouncing Judge Richard Goldstone as an abominable anti-Semite. He himself, by the way, never risked his skin as a combat soldier – this national hero served as an NCO for religious services in a transport unit.
800 years ago, Rabbi Moshe Ben-Nahman, called Nahmanides, coined the phrase “Scoundrel with the permission of the Torah” - meaning a person who does despicable things which are not expressly forbidden in the Bible. I am not sure if even this appellation would fit Yishai, since the Bible forbids more than once the mistreatment of strangers – “Ye oppress not the stranger, the fatherless and the widow” (Jer. 7:6), “He…loveth the stranger, in giving him food and raiment” (Deut. 10:18) and many other commandments to this effect.
BUT More important than Yishai himself is the phenomenon that he represents: the invocation of the demographic demon, which terrifies the country.
62 years after its foundation, the State of Israel is still living in fear of the “demographic danger”. It is afraid of its Arab citizens, and therefore discriminates against them in every sphere. It is afraid of the 400 thousand Russians who have come to this country with their Jewish relatives in accordance with the Law of Return, but whose mothers were not Jewish. Here is a built-in contradiction: while the Nativ operators are interested in maximizing the number of immigrants, Yishai and his people deny these very same immigrants the right to marry Jews or to be buried in Jewish graveyards. They serve in the army, but if they fall in action they cannot be buried next to their comrades.
Practically all Hebrew Israelis want a state with a Hebrew majority, where the Hebrew language, culture and tradition are cultivated. But many of us do not want a man-hunting, woman-hunting and child-hunting state, closed to asylum-seekers, where foreign workers who outstay their welcome must live in permanent fear, like our ancestors in the ghettoes.
In order to exorcise the demographic demon, my friends and I have applied to the courts and requested that the registration “Nation: Jewish” in the Ministry’s Register of Residents be replaced with “Nation: Israeli”. Our application was rejected by Judge Noam Solberg – the very same person the Minister of Justice is moving mountains to get appointed as Attorney General.
permlink: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1258253296
Ad in Ha'aretz, Nov. 13, 20 09
Netanyahu has come backFrom WashingtonWithout any worriesNO settlement freezeAnd thereforeNO partnerNO threat toThe Government coalition
weekly ads archive
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad
~~~
Uri Avnery
Scoundrel With PermissionWHEN THE TV news starts with a murder, people are relieved
Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
~~~
A MATTER OF LEGITIMACY
by Adam Keller and Beate Zilversmidt
Other countries may be able to remain contemptuous and uncaring when the world casts them in the role of a brutal Goliath, Israel just can't afford it
Read more ... http://toibillboard.info/144lead.htm
in 'The Other Israel' November online
~~~~
Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
מודעה ב"הארץ" 13 בנובםבר
נתניהו חזר מוושינגטון –אין לו עוד דאגות:אין הקפאת התנחלויותולכן גםאין שותף,אין איוםעל שלמות הקואליציה.
ארכיון צודעות: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad
~~~
אורי אבנרי
נבל ברשות התורהכאשר מהדורת החדשות בטלוויזיה נפתחת בידיעה על רצח, נושמים בישראל
טכסט מלא http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1258253168
ארכיון מאמרים http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
~~~
.
הבלוג של אדם : http://adam-keller1.blogspot.com
Uri Avnery14.11.09
Scoundrel With Permission
WHEN THE TV news starts with a murder, people are relieved.
This means that no war has broken out, no suicide bomb has exploded, no Qassam rocket has been launched at Sderot. Ahmadinejad has not test-fired a new missile that can reach Tel Aviv. Just another murder.
Not that Israel is the world’s murder capital. We shall have to work much harder to reach the heights of New York or Moscow, not to mention Johannesburg. Statistics even show our murder rate is declining.
But lately Israel has been shocked by a series of exceptionally brutal murders. A husband took revenge on his wife by killing his little daughter and burying her in a forest. A man who lived with the wife of his son killed her daughter, his own granddaughter, put her little body in a suitcase and threw it into Tel Aviv’s Yarkon river. A son who quarreled with his wife killed her and her mother, cut up both bodies and dispersed the parts in garbage bins. A young man who had a quarrel with his mother killed her, and then went off to kill his brother, too. A man in his 70s killed his wife in her sleep with a hammer.
In recent weeks, there were two cases that trumped even these atrocities.
Damian Karlik, an immigrant from Russia who worked as head waiter in a Russian restaurant, was dismissed for theft and decided to take revenge on the owners, Russian immigrants like him. He went to their apartment and stabbed to death six people, one after another – the owner and his wife, their son and his wife and their two small grandchildren.
An immigrant from the US called Jack Teitel, an inhabitant of one of the most extreme West Bank settlements, has now confessed to the killing some years ago of two random Palestinians. He returned briefly to America, and, after coming back, put bombs into police cars. Why? Because the police were protecting gays and lesbians. He is also suspected of killing two traffic policemen for the same reason. He also claimed responsibility for the mass killing of gays in a Tel Aviv club (though that may be empty bragging). He planted a bomb in the home of some Messianic Jews (Jews who regard Jesus as the Messiah) and grievously injured a 15-year-old. He tried to kill the leftist professor Ze’ev Sternhell with another bomb which wounded him.
WHAT IS so special about these two cases is that they involved new immigrants who were allowed into Israel in spite of already being under investigation for crimes in their homelands.
The Law of Return accords every Jew the right to immigrate (“make Aliyah”) to Israel, where he or she automatically receives Israeli citizenship on arrival. But even according to this law, the Minister of the Interior can reject people suspected of serious crimes.
This makes the case of Karlik especially interesting. He was suspected in Russia of armed robbery, but the organization in charge of issuing Israeli immigration permits in Russia asserts that they did not know about it.
This organization, Nativ (“path”), was active in the Soviet Union as one of the Israeli secret services, like the Mossad and Shin Bet. Its particular job was to infiltrate Jewish communities and induce Jews to come to Israel.
Apart from this, Nativ was also engaged, of course, in espionage. It is no secret that for decades immigrants arriving from the Soviet Union were interrogated exhaustively by the Shin Bet about military, economic and other installations in their former homeland. The precious information thus gathered ensured Israel a high standing in the Western intelligence community.
After the collapse of the Communist regime, Nativ was to be disbanded, but like every threatened organization it fought for its life. It was decided to leave it intact and put it in charge of immigration to Israel from all the former Soviet republics.
The religious credentials of the immigrants interest Nativ much more than any criminal record they may have. It seems Nativ has no contacts with the Russian police, who probably suspect it of other activities.
Thus it happens that a person like Karlik, a man under investigation for robbery with violence, was found suitable for immigration. His ethnic pedigree was impeccable. After his arrival in Israel, the Russian authorities officially applied for his extradition for robbery, but the request was denied. The escaped robber was issued a license for a gun and allowed to work as a guard.
Teitel’s case is similar. True, in the US there is no Nativ, but the logic of those in charge of emigration to Israel is the same: to bring immigrants without asking unnecessary questions. According to religious law, a Jew remains a Jew even if he sins.
THESE AFFAIRS shine a spotlight on one of the guiding principles of the Zionist establishment: to bring Jews to Israel, whatever the price. Statistics must show that this year – or any other year – a record number of Jews have “made Aliyah”. In many communities, the bottom of the barrel is scraped in order to bring more Jews. Emissaries find “lost tribes” of Jews in Peru and Ethiopia, India and China.
In this situation, there is an understandable temptation to overlook the criminal past of would-be immigrants. So what if somebody, a kosher Jew, has robbed a bank or mistreated children? In Israel he will perhaps mend his ways. Or if somebody was put on trial abroad for illegal arms deals, money laundering and/or selling blood-stained diamonds – he is welcome, and if he brings his millions with him, the leaders of the state will be happy to be photographed in his company.
That is true, of course, only for an immigrant who is a Jew according to the Halakha (religious law). If he is a Goy, the story is quite different. That is the province of the leader of the Shas party, Eli Yishai.
IN THE present Israeli government there are several candidates for the title of Racist in Chief. An objective jury would be hard put to choose between them.
The favorite is the Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, a certified racist whose entire career in Israel is built on hatred towards Arabs and foreigners. It was he who appointed as Minister of Justice the kippa-wearing lawyer Ya’akov Ne’eman, who is now busily engaged in securing the all-important position of Legal Advisor to the Government (practically the Attorney General) for a judge educated in a Yeshiva (Orthodox school), who lives in one of the more extreme settlements and who has become notorious for several rightist judgments. Binyamin Netanyahu himself, of course, is also an excellent candidate.
But the King of Racists is the Minister of the Interior. He is more dangerous than his colleagues because he has absolute power over the civil status of every person in Israel, immigration and emigration, the Register of Residents and the expulsion of foreigners. In this position he is now doing to foreigners what others have done to Jews in many countries. He is untiring in his efforts to guard the real Israel – not the “Jewish and democratic state” as it is officially defined, but rather the “Jewish and demographic state”. For this purpose he has recently created a special para-police force for the detection and deportation of illegal foreigners.
It is difficult to decide whether Yishai is an extreme fanatic or a complete cynic, or some strange combination. As matter of fact, when Shas was still a moderate party, in those distant days when its guru, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, ruled that it is permissible to give back the occupied territories, and its former leader, Aryeh Deri, was the darling of the left, Yishai, too, declared “Yes to Oslo, Yes to the evacuation of Jews from Hebron, Yes to Arafat!” But since then much dirty water has flowed down our polluted rivers, Shas has turned into a radical right-wing party and Yishai is now the most extreme rightist in the government.
His unshakable devotion to the purity of the race arouses admiration. Hardly a day passes without some shocking news about his activites. He fights like a tiger for the expulsion of 1500 children of foreign workers who were born in Israel, who speak Hebrew and attend Israeli schools, who have no other homeland. Yishai is ready to lay down his life for their deportation.
The Interior Ministry prevents the entry of American and European citizens who bear Arab names. Officials of the UN and the EU in charge of projects for the Palestinians are normally unable to enter from Jordan (or anywhere else outside Israel), and if they somehow do obtain permission – they are then forbidden to cross the Green Line into Israel. Foreign women married to Israelis are expelled without mercy. There is no end to the examples.
In the eyes of Yishai, every son of a Thai is an enemy of the Jewish state, every daughter of a Colombian worker is a threat to the purity of the Jewish people. He has declared that the foreign workers are an “infection”, and warned that Tel Aviv is “becoming Africa”. He has disclosed that the foreigners carry frightening diseases, such as AIDS, tuberculosis and such. (And in this respect they resemble gays and lesbians, who, according to Yishai, are “sick people”.
Such a person would not remain a minister in the cabinet of the US or most European countries. In the homeland of the Nuremberg laws he would not even come close to a government position.
Recently, during the operation “Cast Lead”, Yishai demanded that we “bomb thousands of houses, to destroy Gaza” – which does not hinder him from denouncing Judge Richard Goldstone as an abominable anti-Semite. He himself, by the way, never risked his skin as a combat soldier – this national hero served as an NCO for religious services in a transport unit.
800 years ago, Rabbi Moshe Ben-Nahman, called Nahmanides, coined the phrase “Scoundrel with the permission of the Torah” - meaning a person who does despicable things which are not expressly forbidden in the Bible. I am not sure if even this appellation would fit Yishai, since the Bible forbids more than once the mistreatment of strangers – “Ye oppress not the stranger, the fatherless and the widow” (Jer. 7:6), “He…loveth the stranger, in giving him food and raiment” (Deut. 10:18) and many other commandments to this effect.
BUT More important than Yishai himself is the phenomenon that he represents: the invocation of the demographic demon, which terrifies the country.
62 years after its foundation, the State of Israel is still living in fear of the “demographic danger”. It is afraid of its Arab citizens, and therefore discriminates against them in every sphere. It is afraid of the 400 thousand Russians who have come to this country with their Jewish relatives in accordance with the Law of Return, but whose mothers were not Jewish. Here is a built-in contradiction: while the Nativ operators are interested in maximizing the number of immigrants, Yishai and his people deny these very same immigrants the right to marry Jews or to be buried in Jewish graveyards. They serve in the army, but if they fall in action they cannot be buried next to their comrades.
Practically all Hebrew Israelis want a state with a Hebrew majority, where the Hebrew language, culture and tradition are cultivated. But many of us do not want a man-hunting, woman-hunting and child-hunting state, closed to asylum-seekers, where foreign workers who outstay their welcome must live in permanent fear, like our ancestors in the ghettoes.
In order to exorcise the demographic demon, my friends and I have applied to the courts and requested that the registration “Nation: Jewish” in the Ministry’s Register of Residents be replaced with “Nation: Israeli”. Our application was rejected by Judge Noam Solberg – the very same person the Minister of Justice is moving mountains to get appointed as Attorney General.
permlink: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1258253296
miércoles, 11 de noviembre de 2009
Mahmud Darwish - Cadáveres anónimos
Mahmud Darwish. “Cadáveres anónimos”
Trad. María Luisa Prieto
Cadáveres anónimos.
Ningún olvido los reúne,
Ningún recuerdo los separa…
Olvidados en la hierba invernal
Sobre la vía pública.
Entre dos largos relatos de bravura
Y sufrimiento.
“¡Yo soy la víctima!” “¡No. Yo soy
la única víctima!”. Ellos no replicaron:
“Una víctima no mata a otra.
Y en esta historia hay un asesino
Y una víctima”. Eran niños,
Recogían la nieve de los cipreses de Cristo
Y jugaban con los ángeles porque tenían
La misma edad... huían de la escuela
Para escapar de las matemáticas
Y la antigua poesía heroica. En las barreras,
Jugaban con los soldados
Al juego inocente de la muerte.
No les decían: dejad los fusiles
Y abrid las rutas para que la mariposa encuentre
A su madre cerca de la mañana,
Para que volemos con la mariposa
Fuera de los sueños, porque los sueños son estrechos
Para nuestras puertas. Eran niños,
Jugaban e inventaban un cuento para la rosa roja
Bajo la nieve, detrás de dos largos relatos
De bravura y sufrimiento.
Luego escapaban con los ángeles pequeños
Hacia un cielo límpido.
Trad. María Luisa Prieto
Cadáveres anónimos.
Ningún olvido los reúne,
Ningún recuerdo los separa…
Olvidados en la hierba invernal
Sobre la vía pública.
Entre dos largos relatos de bravura
Y sufrimiento.
“¡Yo soy la víctima!” “¡No. Yo soy
la única víctima!”. Ellos no replicaron:
“Una víctima no mata a otra.
Y en esta historia hay un asesino
Y una víctima”. Eran niños,
Recogían la nieve de los cipreses de Cristo
Y jugaban con los ángeles porque tenían
La misma edad... huían de la escuela
Para escapar de las matemáticas
Y la antigua poesía heroica. En las barreras,
Jugaban con los soldados
Al juego inocente de la muerte.
No les decían: dejad los fusiles
Y abrid las rutas para que la mariposa encuentre
A su madre cerca de la mañana,
Para que volemos con la mariposa
Fuera de los sueños, porque los sueños son estrechos
Para nuestras puertas. Eran niños,
Jugaban e inventaban un cuento para la rosa roja
Bajo la nieve, detrás de dos largos relatos
De bravura y sufrimiento.
Luego escapaban con los ángeles pequeños
Hacia un cielo límpido.
lunes, 9 de noviembre de 2009
IV Muestra de Derechos Humanos y cine invisible Ad Hocs, 2009
Están todos invitados del miércoles al sábado. El viernes 13 a las 16 hrs. se proyectarán los siguientes documentales "invisibilizados":Ø “Lo que Israel no quiere que veamos”. Jon Sistiaga. Reportajes Cuatro, España, 2008, 45 min.
Ø “Compensaciones por el horror”. Ochenta mil supervivientes del holocausto viven en condiciones de miseria en Israel. Guy Merzo y Orly Vilnai. Producciones Shamaim y Content, Israel, 2008. 50 min.
Ø Escuelas mixtas de palestinos y judíos. “Bridge over the wadi”, Heyman Brothers Films. 2006. 50 min.
Ø Abusos sexuales y el Vaticano, Up Roar for BBC, 2006. Reino Unido, 50 min.
Noticias de Gush Shalom: Avnery sobre Abbas y Obama, algo sobre el contrabando de armas y más sobre Teitel
Gracias a Eduardo Mosches por el envío.
Ad in Ha'aretz, Nov. 6, 20 09
Weeds
The police announced proudlyThe capture of theSettler-terrorist Ja’acov Teitel
full text: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1257415995
~~~
Uri Avnery
A Line in the Sand
MAHMOUD ABBAS is fed up. The day before yesterday he withdrew his candidacy for the coming presidential election in... Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
~~~
The arms smugglers of the State of Israel need not hide, need not put civilian cargoes in front for camouflage or raise all kinds of flags of convenience. Everything is perfectly legalat Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
מודעה ב"הארץ" 6 בנובםבר
עשבים שוטיםהמשטרה הודיעה בגאווהעל לכידת המתנחל המחבליעקב טייטל....
טכסט מלא: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad/1257416082
~~~
אורי אבנרי
קו בחוללאבו-מאזן נמאס. שלשום הודיע שלא יציג את מועמדותו מחדש לתפקיד נשיא הרשות הפלסטינית.אני מבין לנפשו.הוא מרגיש שבגדו... טכסט מלא
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1257655802
ארכיון מאמרים של אורי אבנרי
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
~~~
מבריחי הנשק של מדינת ישראל לא צריכים להסתתר, לא צריכים להחביא מאחורי מטען אזרחי ולהניף כל מיני דגלים. הכל חוקי לחלוטין.
בבלוג של אדם : http://adam-keller1.blogspot.com
Ad in Ha'aretz, Nov. 6, 20 09
Weeds
The police announced proudlyThe capture of theSettler-terrorist Ja’acov Teitel
full text: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1257415995
~~~
Uri Avnery
A Line in the Sand
MAHMOUD ABBAS is fed up. The day before yesterday he withdrew his candidacy for the coming presidential election in... Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
~~~
The arms smugglers of the State of Israel need not hide, need not put civilian cargoes in front for camouflage or raise all kinds of flags of convenience. Everything is perfectly legalat Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
מודעה ב"הארץ" 6 בנובםבר
עשבים שוטיםהמשטרה הודיעה בגאווהעל לכידת המתנחל המחבליעקב טייטל....
טכסט מלא: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad/1257416082
~~~
אורי אבנרי
קו בחוללאבו-מאזן נמאס. שלשום הודיע שלא יציג את מועמדותו מחדש לתפקיד נשיא הרשות הפלסטינית.אני מבין לנפשו.הוא מרגיש שבגדו... טכסט מלא
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1257655802
ארכיון מאמרים של אורי אבנרי
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
~~~
מבריחי הנשק של מדינת ישראל לא צריכים להסתתר, לא צריכים להחביא מאחורי מטען אזרחי ולהניף כל מיני דגלים. הכל חוקי לחלוטין.
בבלוג של אדם : http://adam-keller1.blogspot.com
sábado, 7 de noviembre de 2009
El invierno que se avecina en Gaza: apoyo de Carter al informe Goldstone
Gracias a Néstor Braunstein por el envío.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/opinion/06iht-edcarter.html?ref=global
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/opinion/06iht-edcarter.html?ref=global
lunes, 2 de noviembre de 2009
Gush shalom... un ejército que tiene un Estado
Gracias a Eduardo Mosches por el envío
www.gush-shalom.org
Truth / Правда / אמת / حقيقة
English website http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_en.html
Статьи Ури Авнери http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ru/avnery
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_he.html אתר בעברית
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ar/avnery اوري افنيري
Un ejército que tiene un Estado
Ad in Ha'aretz, Oct. 30, 20 09
AN ARMY THAT HAS A STATE
full text
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1256851918
מודעה ב"הארץ"30 באוקטובר צבא שיש לו מדינהטכסט מלא: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad/1256852200
~~~
Uri Avnery sobre Rabin
Uri Avnery
Count Me OutA YEAR before the Oslo agreement, I had a meeting with Yasser Arafat in Tunis. He was full of curiosity about... Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
להיות שם? לא, תודה!
שנה לפני חתימת הסכם-אוסלו ביקרתי את יאסר ערפאת בתוניס. הוא היה מלא סקרנות כלפי אישיותו של יצחק רבין, ראש-
ממשלנו... טכסט מלא http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1257023553 ארכיון
מאמרים של אורי אבנרי http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
~~~
Fire on the Mount
at Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
אש על ההר בבלוג של אדם : http://adam-keller1.blogspot.com
A REAL PEACE PROCESS
Gush Shalom addresses J Street
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/press_releases/1256851306
חדש בפורום
אכן יש ויש...צפירה יונתן על ... נחשו מיhttp://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/archive/1257003355
Uri Avnery31.10.09
Count Me Out
A YEAR before the Oslo agreement, I had a meeting with Yasser Arafat in Tunis. He was full of curiosity about Yitzhak Rabin, who had just been elected Prime Minister.
I described him as well as I could and ended with the words: "He is as honest as a politician can be."
Arafat broke into laughter, and all the others present, among them Mahmoud Abbas and Yasser Abed-Rabbo, joined in.
FOR THE sake of proper disclosure: I always liked Rabin as a human being. I especially liked some traits of his.
First of all: his honesty. This is such a rare quality among politicians that it stood out like an oasis in the desert. His mouth and his heart were one, as far as is possible in political life. He did not lie when he could possibly avoid it.
He was a decent human being. Witness the "dollar affair": when his term as Israeli ambassador in Washington DC came to an end, his wife Leah left behind a bank account, contrary to Israeli law at the time. When it was discovered, he protected his wife by assuming personal responsibility. At the time, unlike today, "assuming responsibility" was not an empty phrase. He left the Prime Minister’s office.
I liked even his most evident personality trait – his introversion. He was withdrawn, with few human contacts. Not a fellow-well-met back slapper, not one for lavishing compliments, indeed an anti-politician.
Also, I liked the way he told people straight to the face what he thought of them. Some of his expressions, in juicy Hebrew, have become part of Israeli folklore. Such as "indefatigable intriguer" (about Shimon Peres), "propellers" (about the settlers, meaning electric fans which spin noisily without going anywhere), "garbage of weaklings" (about people leaving Israel for good).
He had no small talk. In every conversation, he came to the point right at the start.
His H
One might imagine that these characteristics would alienate people. Quite to the contrary, people were attracted to him because of them. In a world of pretentious, garrulous, mendacious, back-slapping politicians, he was a refreshing rarity.
MORE THAN anything else, I respected Rabin for his dramatic change of outlook at the age of 70. The man who had been a soldier since he was 18, who had fought Arabs all his life, suddenly became a peace-fighter. And not just a fighter for peace in general, but for peace with the Palestinian people, whose very existence had always been denied by the leaders of Israel.
The public memory, one of the most effective instruments of the establishment, is trying nowadays to obliterate this chapter. Throughout the country one can buy postcards showing Rabin shaking hands with King Hussein at the signing of the Israeli-Jordanian peace agreement, but it is almost impossible to find a card showing Rabin with Arafat at the Oslo agreement signing ceremony. Never happened.
As I have recounted before, I was an eye-witness to his inner revolution. >From 1969 on, until after the Oslo agreement, we had a running debate about the Palestinian issue - at the Washington embassy, at parties where we met casually (generally at the bar), in the Prime Minister’s office and at his private home.
In one 1969 conversation, he objected strenuously to any dealings with the Palestinians. One sentence imprinted itself upon my mind: "I want an open border, not a secure border" (a play of words in Hebrew). At the time, his former commander, Yigal Alon, was spreading the slogan "secure borders", in order to justify extensive annexations of occupied territory. Rabin wanted an open border between Israel and the West Bank, which he intended to give back to King Hussein. After this conversation, I wrote him that the border would be open only if there was a Palestinian state on the other side, because then the economic realities would compel both states – Israel and Palestine – to maintain close relations.
In 1975, after the start of my secret contacts with the PLO, I went to brief him (in accordance with the express wishes of the PLO). In the conversation that took place at the Prime Minister’s office, I tried to convince him to give up the "Jordanian option", which I had always considered silly. He refused adamantly. "We must make peace with Hussein," he told me. "After he has signed, I don’t care if the king is toppled." Like Shimon Peres and many others, he entertained the illusion that the king would give up East Jerusalem.
I told him that I could not follow the logic of this line of thought. Let’s imagine that the king signed and was then overthrown. What next? The PLO would take over a state extending from Tulkarm to the approaches of Baghdad, in which four Arab armies could easily assemble. Was that, I asked, what he wanted?
In this conversation, too, one sentence imprinted itself on my mind: "I will not take the smallest step towards the Palestinians, because the first step would lead inevitably to the creation of a Palestinian state, and I don’t want that." In the end he told me: "I oppose what you are doing, but I will not prevent you from meeting with them. If these meetings reveal things to you that you think the Israeli Prime Minister should know about, my door is open." That was Rabin all over. The contacts, of course, broke the law.
After that I brought him several messages from Arafat, conveyed to me by the PLO representative in London, Sa’id Hamami. Arafat proposed small mutual gestures. Rabin refused all of them.
Consequently I was all the more impressed by Oslo. Later Rabin explained to me, one Shabbat at his private apartment, how he arrived there: King Hussein had resigned his responsibility for the West Bank. The "village leagues", set up by Israel as pliant "representatives" of the Palestinians, were a dismal failure. As Minister of Defense he summoned local Palestinian leaders for individual consultations, and one after another they told him that their political address was in Tunis. After that, at the Madrid conference, Israel agreed to negotiate with a joint Jordanian-Palestinian delegation, but then the Jordanians told them that all Palestinian matters must be discussed with the Palestinian members alone. But at every meeting, the Palestinian delegates asked for a pause in order to call Tunis and get instructions from Arafat. Rabin’s conclusion: if all decisions are made by Arafat anyhow, why not talk with him directly?
It has always been said that Rabin had an "analytical mind". He did not have much of an imagination, but he viewed facts soberly, analyzed them logically and drew his conclusions.
IF SO, why did the Oslo agreement fail?
The practical reasons are easy to see. From the beginning, the agreement was build on shaky foundations, because it lacked the main thing: a clear definition of the final objective of the process.
For Arafat it was self-evident that the agreed "interim stages" would lead to an independent Palestinian state in the whole of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, with perhaps some minor exchanges of territory. East Jerusalem, including of course the Holy Shrines, was to become the capital of Palestine. The settlements would be dismantled. I am convinced that he would have been satisfied with a symbolic return of a limited number of refugees to Israel proper.
That was Arafat’s price for giving up 78% of the country, and no Palestinian leader, present or future, could be satisfied with less.
But Rabin’s aim was unclear, perhaps even to himself. At the time he was not yet ready to accept a Palestinian state. Absent an agreed destination, all the "interim phases" went awry. Every step caused new conflicts. (As I wrote at the time, when traveling from Paris to Berlin, one can stop at interim stations. When traveling from Paris to Madrid, one can also stop at interim stations - but they will be quite different ones.)
Arafat was conscious of the faults of the agreement. He told his people that it was "the best possible agreement in the worst possible circumstances". But he believed that the dynamics of the peace process would overcome the obstacles on the way. So did I. We were both wrong.
After the signing, Rabin began to hesitate. Instead of rushing forwards to create facts, he dithered. This gave the opposing forces in Israel time to recoup from the shock, regroup and start a counterattack, which ended in his assassination.
Perhaps this mistake could have been foreseen. Rabin was by nature a cautious person. He was conscious of the heavy responsibility that rested on his shoulders. He had no taste for drama, unlike Begin, nor was he blessed with a vivid imagination, like Herzl. For better and for worse, he lived in the real world. He had no idea how to change it, though he knew that he had to do just that.
BUT THESE explanations are only the foam upon the waves. Deep under the surface, powerful currents were at work. They pushed Rabin off course and in the end they swallowed him.
Rabin was a child of the classic Zionist ideology. He never rebelled against it. He carried in his body the genetic code of the Zionist movement, a movement whose aim from the beginning was to turn the Land of Israel into an exclusively Jewish state, which denied the very existence of the Arab Palestinian people and whose logic ultimately meant their displacement.
Like most of his generation in the country, he absorbed this ideology with his mother’s milk, and was raised on it throughout. It shaped his ideas so thoroughly that he was not even aware of it. At the critical juncture of his life, he fell victim to an insoluble inner contradiction: his analytical mind told him to make peace with the Palestinians, to "give up" a part of the country and to dismantle the settlements, while his Zionist genetic heritage opposed this with all its might. That manifested itself visibly at the Oslo agreement signing ceremony: he offered his hand to Arafat because his mind commanded it, but all his body language expressed rejection.
It is impossible to make peace without a basic mental and emotional commitment to peace. Impossible to change the direction of a historic movement without reassessing its history. Impossible for a leader to steer his people towards a total change (as Ataturk did in Turkey, for example) if he is not completely devoted to the change himself. Impossible to make peace with an enemy without understanding his truth.
Rabin’s inner convictions continued to evolve after Oslo. Between him and Arafat, mutual respect grew. Perhaps he would have arrived, in his slow and cautious way, at the necessary mental change. The assassin and his handlers must have been afraid of this and decided to forestall it.
Rabin’s failure will find its expression at the memorial rally next week at the very place where we witnessed his murder, 14 years ago. The main speakers will be two of the gravediggers of the Oslo agreement, Shimon Peres and Ehud Barak, as well as Tzipi Livni and Education Minister Gideon Sa’ar, who belonged to the forces that created the climate for the murder. Rabin, I assume, will turn in his grave.
Will I be there? Not me, thank you very much.
permlink: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1257023364
data & Daily updated occupation related reading
http://www.kibush.co.il
http://www.btselem.org
http://www.ochaopt.org
If instead of daily looking at websites you prefer to receive a weekly selection by email
subscribe to TOI-Billboard
by writing in the subject line
"Send me TOI" to: mhtml:%7BAFAE16F9-BE05-4577-8087-8D08CA43582C%7Dmid://00000028/!x-usc:http://us.mc520.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=otherisr@actcom.co.il
www.gush-shalom.org
Truth / Правда / אמת / حقيقة
English website http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_en.html
Статьи Ури Авнери http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ru/avnery
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_he.html אתר בעברית
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ar/avnery اوري افنيري
Un ejército que tiene un Estado
Ad in Ha'aretz, Oct. 30, 20 09
AN ARMY THAT HAS A STATE
full text
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1256851918
מודעה ב"הארץ"30 באוקטובר צבא שיש לו מדינהטכסט מלא: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad/1256852200
~~~
Uri Avnery sobre Rabin
Uri Avnery
Count Me OutA YEAR before the Oslo agreement, I had a meeting with Yasser Arafat in Tunis. He was full of curiosity about... Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
להיות שם? לא, תודה!
שנה לפני חתימת הסכם-אוסלו ביקרתי את יאסר ערפאת בתוניס. הוא היה מלא סקרנות כלפי אישיותו של יצחק רבין, ראש-
ממשלנו... טכסט מלא http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1257023553 ארכיון
מאמרים של אורי אבנרי http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
~~~
Fire on the Mount
at Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
אש על ההר בבלוג של אדם : http://adam-keller1.blogspot.com
A REAL PEACE PROCESS
Gush Shalom addresses J Street
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/press_releases/1256851306
חדש בפורום
אכן יש ויש...צפירה יונתן על ... נחשו מיhttp://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/archive/1257003355
Uri Avnery31.10.09
Count Me Out
A YEAR before the Oslo agreement, I had a meeting with Yasser Arafat in Tunis. He was full of curiosity about Yitzhak Rabin, who had just been elected Prime Minister.
I described him as well as I could and ended with the words: "He is as honest as a politician can be."
Arafat broke into laughter, and all the others present, among them Mahmoud Abbas and Yasser Abed-Rabbo, joined in.
FOR THE sake of proper disclosure: I always liked Rabin as a human being. I especially liked some traits of his.
First of all: his honesty. This is such a rare quality among politicians that it stood out like an oasis in the desert. His mouth and his heart were one, as far as is possible in political life. He did not lie when he could possibly avoid it.
He was a decent human being. Witness the "dollar affair": when his term as Israeli ambassador in Washington DC came to an end, his wife Leah left behind a bank account, contrary to Israeli law at the time. When it was discovered, he protected his wife by assuming personal responsibility. At the time, unlike today, "assuming responsibility" was not an empty phrase. He left the Prime Minister’s office.
I liked even his most evident personality trait – his introversion. He was withdrawn, with few human contacts. Not a fellow-well-met back slapper, not one for lavishing compliments, indeed an anti-politician.
Also, I liked the way he told people straight to the face what he thought of them. Some of his expressions, in juicy Hebrew, have become part of Israeli folklore. Such as "indefatigable intriguer" (about Shimon Peres), "propellers" (about the settlers, meaning electric fans which spin noisily without going anywhere), "garbage of weaklings" (about people leaving Israel for good).
He had no small talk. In every conversation, he came to the point right at the start.
His H
One might imagine that these characteristics would alienate people. Quite to the contrary, people were attracted to him because of them. In a world of pretentious, garrulous, mendacious, back-slapping politicians, he was a refreshing rarity.
MORE THAN anything else, I respected Rabin for his dramatic change of outlook at the age of 70. The man who had been a soldier since he was 18, who had fought Arabs all his life, suddenly became a peace-fighter. And not just a fighter for peace in general, but for peace with the Palestinian people, whose very existence had always been denied by the leaders of Israel.
The public memory, one of the most effective instruments of the establishment, is trying nowadays to obliterate this chapter. Throughout the country one can buy postcards showing Rabin shaking hands with King Hussein at the signing of the Israeli-Jordanian peace agreement, but it is almost impossible to find a card showing Rabin with Arafat at the Oslo agreement signing ceremony. Never happened.
As I have recounted before, I was an eye-witness to his inner revolution. >From 1969 on, until after the Oslo agreement, we had a running debate about the Palestinian issue - at the Washington embassy, at parties where we met casually (generally at the bar), in the Prime Minister’s office and at his private home.
In one 1969 conversation, he objected strenuously to any dealings with the Palestinians. One sentence imprinted itself upon my mind: "I want an open border, not a secure border" (a play of words in Hebrew). At the time, his former commander, Yigal Alon, was spreading the slogan "secure borders", in order to justify extensive annexations of occupied territory. Rabin wanted an open border between Israel and the West Bank, which he intended to give back to King Hussein. After this conversation, I wrote him that the border would be open only if there was a Palestinian state on the other side, because then the economic realities would compel both states – Israel and Palestine – to maintain close relations.
In 1975, after the start of my secret contacts with the PLO, I went to brief him (in accordance with the express wishes of the PLO). In the conversation that took place at the Prime Minister’s office, I tried to convince him to give up the "Jordanian option", which I had always considered silly. He refused adamantly. "We must make peace with Hussein," he told me. "After he has signed, I don’t care if the king is toppled." Like Shimon Peres and many others, he entertained the illusion that the king would give up East Jerusalem.
I told him that I could not follow the logic of this line of thought. Let’s imagine that the king signed and was then overthrown. What next? The PLO would take over a state extending from Tulkarm to the approaches of Baghdad, in which four Arab armies could easily assemble. Was that, I asked, what he wanted?
In this conversation, too, one sentence imprinted itself on my mind: "I will not take the smallest step towards the Palestinians, because the first step would lead inevitably to the creation of a Palestinian state, and I don’t want that." In the end he told me: "I oppose what you are doing, but I will not prevent you from meeting with them. If these meetings reveal things to you that you think the Israeli Prime Minister should know about, my door is open." That was Rabin all over. The contacts, of course, broke the law.
After that I brought him several messages from Arafat, conveyed to me by the PLO representative in London, Sa’id Hamami. Arafat proposed small mutual gestures. Rabin refused all of them.
Consequently I was all the more impressed by Oslo. Later Rabin explained to me, one Shabbat at his private apartment, how he arrived there: King Hussein had resigned his responsibility for the West Bank. The "village leagues", set up by Israel as pliant "representatives" of the Palestinians, were a dismal failure. As Minister of Defense he summoned local Palestinian leaders for individual consultations, and one after another they told him that their political address was in Tunis. After that, at the Madrid conference, Israel agreed to negotiate with a joint Jordanian-Palestinian delegation, but then the Jordanians told them that all Palestinian matters must be discussed with the Palestinian members alone. But at every meeting, the Palestinian delegates asked for a pause in order to call Tunis and get instructions from Arafat. Rabin’s conclusion: if all decisions are made by Arafat anyhow, why not talk with him directly?
It has always been said that Rabin had an "analytical mind". He did not have much of an imagination, but he viewed facts soberly, analyzed them logically and drew his conclusions.
IF SO, why did the Oslo agreement fail?
The practical reasons are easy to see. From the beginning, the agreement was build on shaky foundations, because it lacked the main thing: a clear definition of the final objective of the process.
For Arafat it was self-evident that the agreed "interim stages" would lead to an independent Palestinian state in the whole of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, with perhaps some minor exchanges of territory. East Jerusalem, including of course the Holy Shrines, was to become the capital of Palestine. The settlements would be dismantled. I am convinced that he would have been satisfied with a symbolic return of a limited number of refugees to Israel proper.
That was Arafat’s price for giving up 78% of the country, and no Palestinian leader, present or future, could be satisfied with less.
But Rabin’s aim was unclear, perhaps even to himself. At the time he was not yet ready to accept a Palestinian state. Absent an agreed destination, all the "interim phases" went awry. Every step caused new conflicts. (As I wrote at the time, when traveling from Paris to Berlin, one can stop at interim stations. When traveling from Paris to Madrid, one can also stop at interim stations - but they will be quite different ones.)
Arafat was conscious of the faults of the agreement. He told his people that it was "the best possible agreement in the worst possible circumstances". But he believed that the dynamics of the peace process would overcome the obstacles on the way. So did I. We were both wrong.
After the signing, Rabin began to hesitate. Instead of rushing forwards to create facts, he dithered. This gave the opposing forces in Israel time to recoup from the shock, regroup and start a counterattack, which ended in his assassination.
Perhaps this mistake could have been foreseen. Rabin was by nature a cautious person. He was conscious of the heavy responsibility that rested on his shoulders. He had no taste for drama, unlike Begin, nor was he blessed with a vivid imagination, like Herzl. For better and for worse, he lived in the real world. He had no idea how to change it, though he knew that he had to do just that.
BUT THESE explanations are only the foam upon the waves. Deep under the surface, powerful currents were at work. They pushed Rabin off course and in the end they swallowed him.
Rabin was a child of the classic Zionist ideology. He never rebelled against it. He carried in his body the genetic code of the Zionist movement, a movement whose aim from the beginning was to turn the Land of Israel into an exclusively Jewish state, which denied the very existence of the Arab Palestinian people and whose logic ultimately meant their displacement.
Like most of his generation in the country, he absorbed this ideology with his mother’s milk, and was raised on it throughout. It shaped his ideas so thoroughly that he was not even aware of it. At the critical juncture of his life, he fell victim to an insoluble inner contradiction: his analytical mind told him to make peace with the Palestinians, to "give up" a part of the country and to dismantle the settlements, while his Zionist genetic heritage opposed this with all its might. That manifested itself visibly at the Oslo agreement signing ceremony: he offered his hand to Arafat because his mind commanded it, but all his body language expressed rejection.
It is impossible to make peace without a basic mental and emotional commitment to peace. Impossible to change the direction of a historic movement without reassessing its history. Impossible for a leader to steer his people towards a total change (as Ataturk did in Turkey, for example) if he is not completely devoted to the change himself. Impossible to make peace with an enemy without understanding his truth.
Rabin’s inner convictions continued to evolve after Oslo. Between him and Arafat, mutual respect grew. Perhaps he would have arrived, in his slow and cautious way, at the necessary mental change. The assassin and his handlers must have been afraid of this and decided to forestall it.
Rabin’s failure will find its expression at the memorial rally next week at the very place where we witnessed his murder, 14 years ago. The main speakers will be two of the gravediggers of the Oslo agreement, Shimon Peres and Ehud Barak, as well as Tzipi Livni and Education Minister Gideon Sa’ar, who belonged to the forces that created the climate for the murder. Rabin, I assume, will turn in his grave.
Will I be there? Not me, thank you very much.
permlink: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1257023364
data & Daily updated occupation related reading
http://www.kibush.co.il
http://www.btselem.org
http://www.ochaopt.org
If instead of daily looking at websites you prefer to receive a weekly selection by email
subscribe to TOI-Billboard
by writing in the subject line
"Send me TOI" to: mhtml:%7BAFAE16F9-BE05-4577-8087-8D08CA43582C%7Dmid://00000028/!x-usc:http://us.mc520.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=otherisr@actcom.co.il
sábado, 31 de octubre de 2009
Firmas para apoyar el informe de Goldstone
Recibí este correo de Lev Grinberg, es para que cada uno se sume y haga circular este petitorio. Gracias!
Más información en http://www.openshuhadastreet.org/node/116
This is from a SA-based solidarity organization:Please take one minute to go to www.SupportGoldstone.org and sign thepetition.Here is the text of the petition:The UN Goldstone report is a well-researched, fair-minded report. Israel andHamas mustconduct credible, independent investigations on war crimes and possiblecrimes againsthumanity or face the International Criminal Court. We demand accountabilityfor all victims,respect for the rule of law, international law and human rights.Also watch this profile and interview with Judge Richard Goldstone by BillMoyers:Read more http://www.openshuhadastreet.org/node/116--This is an automatic message from Open Shuhada Street!To manage your subscriptions, browse tohttp://www.openshuhadastreet.org/user/72/notificationsYou can unsubscribe athttp://www.openshuhadastreet.org/notifications/unsubscribe/sid/138?signa...==========Ran GreensteinJohannesburg, South Africa
Más información en http://www.openshuhadastreet.org/node/116
This is from a SA-based solidarity organization:Please take one minute to go to www.SupportGoldstone.org and sign thepetition.Here is the text of the petition:The UN Goldstone report is a well-researched, fair-minded report. Israel andHamas mustconduct credible, independent investigations on war crimes and possiblecrimes againsthumanity or face the International Criminal Court. We demand accountabilityfor all victims,respect for the rule of law, international law and human rights.Also watch this profile and interview with Judge Richard Goldstone by BillMoyers:Read more http://www.openshuhadastreet.org/node/116--This is an automatic message from Open Shuhada Street!To manage your subscriptions, browse tohttp://www.openshuhadastreet.org/user/72/notificationsYou can unsubscribe athttp://www.openshuhadastreet.org/notifications/unsubscribe/sid/138?signa...==========Ran GreensteinJohannesburg, South Africa
miércoles, 28 de octubre de 2009
Amnistía Internacional: "Israel raciona el agua a la población palestina"
Israel raciona el agua a la población palestina
El agua es un derecho humano
Pastores del pueblo de Umm al Jeir, en el sur de la Cisjordania ocupada. Las comunidades dedicadas al pastoreo no tienen agua corriente, por lo que dependen del agua de lluvia almacenada en cisternas como ésta, que a menudo son destruidas por el ejército israelí. © Amnistía Internacional
La población palestina de los Territorios Palestinos Ocupados (TPO) no tiene acceso a un suministro de agua adecuado y seguro. Esto ha entorpecido sobremanera el desarrollo social y económico de los TPO y negado a muchas comunidades su derecho a un nivel de vida digno. El consumo palestino de agua rara vez alcanza los 70 litros diarios por persona, muy por debajo del mínimo diario de 100 litros per cápita recomendado por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. En contraste, el consumo diario per cápita israelí es cuatro veces superior. La desigualdad es aún más pronunciada entre las comunidades palestinas y los asentamientos israelíes ilegales establecidos en los TPO. Hay zonas de Cisjordania en las que los colonos israelíes utilizan hasta 20 veces más agua per cápita que sus vecinos palestinos. En el informe “Israel/ OPT Troubled Waters: Palestinians denied fair access to water” se revela hasta qué punto el carácter discriminatorio de las políticas y prácticas hídricas de Israel niega a la población palestina su derecho al agua. El impacto de la escasez de agua y los malos servicios de saneamiento de los TPO hacen mella en las comunidades más vulnerables, que son aquellas que viven en zonas rurales aisladas y en campos de refugiados superpoblados. Las comunidades rurales a las que no llega la red de suministro de agua dependen de la recogida de agua de lluvia para cubrir sus necesidades domésticas y agrícolas. En Gaza, entre el 90 y el 95 por ciento del suministro de agua está contaminado y no es apto para el consumo humano. Israel no permite llevar agua desde Cisjordania, y el acuífero costero se va agotando cada vez más debido a la sobreexplotación y a la contaminación de las aguas residuales. El bloqueo impide las reparaciones y la reconstrucción de las maltrechas instalaciones de la franja de Gaza.
Tomado de:
http://www.es.amnesty.org/paises/israel-y-territorios-ocupados/israel-raciona-el-agua-a-la-poblacion-palestina/
Ciberacción para apoyar el derecho al agua de la población palestina
La sección española de Amnistía Internacional ha lanzado en su centro de activismo en Internet, www.actuaconamnistia.org, una ciberación para que la ciudadanía le exija a Israel que respete el derecho al agua que tiene la población palestina.
Nota para los medios de comunicación: Este nuevo informe se presenta en el marco de la campaña de Amnistía Internacional Exige Dignidad, que tiene por objeto conseguir que se ponga fin a las violaciones de derechos humanos que contribuyen a crear la pobreza mundial y la intensifican.
La campaña moviliza a personas de todo el mundo con el objetivo de pedir a los gobiernos, empresas y otras entidades con poder que escuchen la voz de quienes viven sumidos en la pobreza y reconozcan y protejan sus derechos humanos. Para más información, visiten: http://www.es.amnesty.org/exigedignidad/
Categorías: Conflictos armados, Crímenes de guerra y crímenes contra la humanidad, Derechos económicos, sociales y culturales, Grupos armados de oposición, Impunidad, Israel y Territorios Ocupados, Oriente Próximo, Medio y Norte de Africa, Personas refugiadas, desplazadas, inmigrantes y demandantes de asilo
y más aquí: http://www.es.amnesty.org/noticias/noticias/articulo/israel-raciona-el-agua-a-un-hilo-a-la-poblacion-palestina/
El agua es un derecho humano
Pastores del pueblo de Umm al Jeir, en el sur de la Cisjordania ocupada. Las comunidades dedicadas al pastoreo no tienen agua corriente, por lo que dependen del agua de lluvia almacenada en cisternas como ésta, que a menudo son destruidas por el ejército israelí. © Amnistía Internacional
La población palestina de los Territorios Palestinos Ocupados (TPO) no tiene acceso a un suministro de agua adecuado y seguro. Esto ha entorpecido sobremanera el desarrollo social y económico de los TPO y negado a muchas comunidades su derecho a un nivel de vida digno. El consumo palestino de agua rara vez alcanza los 70 litros diarios por persona, muy por debajo del mínimo diario de 100 litros per cápita recomendado por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. En contraste, el consumo diario per cápita israelí es cuatro veces superior. La desigualdad es aún más pronunciada entre las comunidades palestinas y los asentamientos israelíes ilegales establecidos en los TPO. Hay zonas de Cisjordania en las que los colonos israelíes utilizan hasta 20 veces más agua per cápita que sus vecinos palestinos. En el informe “Israel/ OPT Troubled Waters: Palestinians denied fair access to water” se revela hasta qué punto el carácter discriminatorio de las políticas y prácticas hídricas de Israel niega a la población palestina su derecho al agua. El impacto de la escasez de agua y los malos servicios de saneamiento de los TPO hacen mella en las comunidades más vulnerables, que son aquellas que viven en zonas rurales aisladas y en campos de refugiados superpoblados. Las comunidades rurales a las que no llega la red de suministro de agua dependen de la recogida de agua de lluvia para cubrir sus necesidades domésticas y agrícolas. En Gaza, entre el 90 y el 95 por ciento del suministro de agua está contaminado y no es apto para el consumo humano. Israel no permite llevar agua desde Cisjordania, y el acuífero costero se va agotando cada vez más debido a la sobreexplotación y a la contaminación de las aguas residuales. El bloqueo impide las reparaciones y la reconstrucción de las maltrechas instalaciones de la franja de Gaza.
Tomado de:
http://www.es.amnesty.org/paises/israel-y-territorios-ocupados/israel-raciona-el-agua-a-la-poblacion-palestina/
Ciberacción para apoyar el derecho al agua de la población palestina
La sección española de Amnistía Internacional ha lanzado en su centro de activismo en Internet, www.actuaconamnistia.org, una ciberación para que la ciudadanía le exija a Israel que respete el derecho al agua que tiene la población palestina.
Nota para los medios de comunicación: Este nuevo informe se presenta en el marco de la campaña de Amnistía Internacional Exige Dignidad, que tiene por objeto conseguir que se ponga fin a las violaciones de derechos humanos que contribuyen a crear la pobreza mundial y la intensifican.
La campaña moviliza a personas de todo el mundo con el objetivo de pedir a los gobiernos, empresas y otras entidades con poder que escuchen la voz de quienes viven sumidos en la pobreza y reconozcan y protejan sus derechos humanos. Para más información, visiten: http://www.es.amnesty.org/exigedignidad/
Categorías: Conflictos armados, Crímenes de guerra y crímenes contra la humanidad, Derechos económicos, sociales y culturales, Grupos armados de oposición, Impunidad, Israel y Territorios Ocupados, Oriente Próximo, Medio y Norte de Africa, Personas refugiadas, desplazadas, inmigrantes y demandantes de asilo
y más aquí: http://www.es.amnesty.org/noticias/noticias/articulo/israel-raciona-el-agua-a-un-hilo-a-la-poblacion-palestina/
martes, 27 de octubre de 2009
Noticias de Gush Shalom y artículo de Uri Avnery
Gracias a Eduardo Mosches por el envío.
www.gush-shalom.org
Truth / Правда / אמת / حقيقة
English website http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_en.html
Статьи Ури Авнери http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ru/avnery
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_he.html אתר בעברית
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ar/avnery اوري افنيري
Stop US tax money flowing to settlers
Gush Shalom approached the National Lawyers' Guild in the US, requesting NLG members to act against American organizations supporting Israeli settlers in the Occupied Territories and get the tax authorities to remove the tax exempt status presently given to donations to the settlers.
Read more: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/events/1256566250
~~~
Ad in Ha'aretz, Oct. 23, 20 09
?A SHAM
To hear testimonies
From soldiers and Gaza residentsIn public and in the presenceOf international observers... full text
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1256319739
~~~
Uri Avnery
Where Have All the Friendships GoneACCORDING TO a Chinese saying, if someone in the street tells you that you are drunk, you can laugh. If a second... Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
~~~
The ceaseless chatteringand more at Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
לעצור זרימת כספי מס אמריקאי למתנחלים
תנועת גוש שלום פנתה אל "אגודת עורכי הדין הלאומית" בארה"ב בבקשה שחברי האגודה יפעלו נגד אגודות התמיכה במתנחלים הפועלות בארה"ב ויביאו לביטול המעמד הפטור ממס שניתן כיום לתרומות הזורמות אל ההתנחלויות.
קראו עודhttp://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/events/1256566250
~~~
מודעה ב"הארץ"23 באוקטובר
כאילו?עדויותמחיילים ומתושבי עזה -בפומבי ובנוכחותמשקיפים בינלאומיים... טכסט מלא:
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad/1256319824
~~~
אורי אבנרי "איפה הידידים כולם..."פתגם סיני אומר שאם אדם אומר לך ברחוב שאתה שיכור, תצחק. אם אדם שני אומר לך שאתה שיכור, תתחיל לחשוש. אם אדם שלישי אומר... טכסט מלא http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1256493910
ארכיון מאמרים של אורי אבנרי
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
~~~
הכל דיבורים, הכל פטפוטים
ועוד בבלוג של אדם : http://adam-keller1.blogspot.com
Uri Avnery24.10.09
"Where Have All the Friendships Gone…"
ACCORDING TO a Chinese saying, if someone in the street tells you that you are drunk, you can laugh. If a second person tells you that you are drunk, start to think about it. If a third one tells you the same, go home and sleep it off.
Our political and military leadership has already encountered the third, fourth and fifth person. All of them say that they must investigate what happened in the "Molten Lead" operation.
They have three options:
to conduct a real investigation.
to ignore the demand and proceed as if nothing has happened.
to conduct a sham inquiry.
IT IS easy to dismiss the first option: it has not the slightest chance of being adopted. Except for the usual suspects (including myself) who demanded an investigation long before anyone in Israel had heard of a judge called Goldstone, nobody supports it.
Among all the members of our political, military and media establishments who are now suggesting an "inquiry", there is no one – literally not one – who means by that a real investigation. The aim is to deceive the Goyim and get them to shut up.
Actually, Israeli law lays down clear guidelines for such investigations. The government decides to set up a commission of investigation. The president of the Supreme Court then appoints the members of the commission. The commission can compel witnesses to testify. Anybody who may be damaged by its conclusions must be warned and given the opportunity to defend themself. Its conclusions are binding.
This law has an interesting history. Sometime in the 50s, David Ben-Gurion demanded the appointment of a "judicial committee of inquiry" to decide who gave the orders for the 1954 "security mishap", also known as the Lavon Affair. (A false flag operation where an espionage network composed of local Jews was activated to bomb American and British offices in Egypt, in order to cause friction between Egypt and the Western powers. The perpetrators were caught.)
Ben-Gurion’s request was denied, under the pretext that there was no law for such a procedure. Furious, Ben-Gurion resigned from the government and left his party. In one of the stormy party sessions, the Minister of Justice, Yaakov Shimshon Shapira, called Ben-Gurion a "fascist". But Shapira, an old Russian Jew, regretted his outburst later. He drafted a special law for the appointment of Commissions of Investigation in the future. After lengthy deliberations in the Knesset (in which I took an active part) the law was adopted and has since been applied, notably in the case of the Sabra and Shatila massacre.
Now I wholeheartedly support the setting up of a Commission of Investigation according to this law.
THE SECOND option is the one proposed by the army Chief of Staff and the Minister of Defense. In America it is called "stonewalling". Meaning: To hell with it.
The army commanders object to any investigation and any inquiry whatsoever. They probably know why. After all, they know the facts. They know that a dark shadow lies over the very decision to go to war, over the planning of the operation, over the instructions given to the troops, and over many dozens of large and small acts committed during the operation.
In their opinion, even if their refusal has severe international repercussions, the consequences of any investigation, even a phony one, would be far worse.
As long as the Chief of Staff sticks to this position, there will be no investigation outside the army, whatever the attitude of the ministers. The army chief, who attends every cabinet meeting, is the largest figure in the room. When he announces that such and such is the "position of the army", no mere politician present would dare to object.
In the "Only Democracy in the Middle East", the law (proposed at the time by Menachem Begin) stipulates that the Government as such is the Commander in Chief of the Israel Defense Forces. That is the theory. In practice, no decision at variance with the "position of the army" has ever been or will ever be adopted.
The army claims to be investigating itself. Ehud Barak represents – willingly or unwillingly – this position. The cabinet has postponed dealing with the matter, and that’s where things stand today.
ON THIS occasion, the spotlight should be turned on the least visible person in Israel: the Chief of the General Staff, Lieutenant General Gabi Ashkenazi, the ultimate Teflon-man. Nothing sticks to him. In this debate, as in all others, he just is not there.
Everybody knows that Ashkenazi is a shy and modest man. He hardly ever speaks, writes or speechifies. On television, he merges into the background.
This is how he looks to the public: an honest soldier, without tricks or ploys, who does his duty quietly, receives his orders from the government and fulfills them loyally. In this he differs from almost all his predecessors, who were boastful, publicity-crazy and loquacious. While most them came from famous elite units or the arrogant Air Force, he is a grey infantry man. The Duke of Wellington, seeing the huge amount of paperwork in his army, once exclaimed: "Soldiers should fight, not write!" He would have liked Ashkenazi
But reality is not always what it seems. Ashkenazi plays a central role in the decision-making process. He was appointed after his predecessor, Dan Halutz, resigned after the failures of Lebanon War II. Under Ashkenazi’s leadership, new doctrines were formulated and put into action in the "Molten Lead" operation. I defined them (on my own responsibility) as "Zero Losses" and "Better to kill a hundred enemy civilians than to lose one of our own soldiers". Since the Gaza war did not lead to a single soldier being put on trial, Ashkenazi must bear the responsibility for everything that happened there.
If an indictment were issued by the International Court in The Hague, Ashkenazi would probably be accorded the place of honor as "Defendant No. 1". No wonder that he objects to any outside investigation, as does Ehud Barak, who would probably occupy the No. 2 place.
THE POLITICIANS who oppose (ever so quietly) the Chief of Staff’s position believe that it is impossible to withstand international pressure completely, and that some kind of an inquiry will have to be conducted. Since not one of them intends to hold a real investigation, they propose to follow a tried and trusted Israeli method, which has worked wonderfully hundreds of times in the past: the method of sham.
A sham inquiry. Sham conclusions. Sham adherence to international law. Sham civilian control over the military.
Nothing simpler than that. An "inquiry committee" (but not a Commission of Investigation according to the law) will be set up, chaired by a suitably patriotic judge and composed of carefully chosen honorable citizens who are all "one of us". Testimonies will be heard behind closed doors (for considerations of security, of course). Army lawyers will prove that everything was perfectly legal, the National Whitewasher, Professor Asa Kasher, will laud the ethics of the Most Moral Army in the World. Generals will speak about our inalienable right to self-defense. In the end, two or three junior officers or privates may be found guilty of "irregularities".
Israel’s friends all over the world will break into an ecstatic chorus: What a lawful state! What a democracy! What morality! Western governments will declare that justice has been done and the case closed. The US veto will see to the rest.
So why don’t the army chiefs accept this proposal? Because they are afraid things might not proceed quite so smoothly. The international community will demand that at least part of the hearings be conducted in open court. There will be a demand for the presence of international observers. And, most importantly: there will be no justifiable way to exclude the testimonies of the Gazans themselves. Things will get complicated. The world will not accept fabricated conclusions. In the end we will be in exactly the same situation. Better to stay put and brave it out, whatever the price.
IN THE meantime, international pressure on Israel is increasing. Even now it has reached unprecedented proportions.
Russia and China have voted in favor of the endorsement of the Goldstone report by the UN. The UK and France "did not take part in the vote", but demanded that Israel conduct a real investigation. We have quarreled with Turkey, until now an important military ally. We have altercations with Sweden, Norway and a number of other friendly countries. The French Foreign Minister has been prevented from crossing into the Gaza Strip and is furious. The already cold peace with Egypt and Jordan has become several degrees colder. Israel is boycotted in many forums. Senior army officers are afraid to travel abroad for fear of arrest.
This raises the question once more: can outside pressure have an impact on Israel?
Certainly it can. The question is: what kind of pressure, what kind of impact?
The pressure has indeed convinced several ministers that an inquiry committee for the Goldstone report has to be set up. But no one in the Israeli establishment – no one at all! – has raised the real question: Perhaps Goldstone is right? Except for the usual suspects, no one in the media, the Knesset or the government has asked: Perhaps war crimes have indeed been committed? The outside pressure has not forced such questions to be raised. They must come from the inside, from the public itself.
The kind of pressure must also be considered. The Goldstone report has an impact on the world because it is precise and targeted: a specific operation, for which specific persons are responsible. It raises a specific demand: an investigation. It attacks a clear and well-defined target: war crimes.
If we apply this to the debate about boycotting Israel: the Goldstone report may be compared to a targeted boycott on the settlements and their helpers, not an unlimited boycott of the State of Israel. A targeted boycott can have a positive impact. A comprehensive, unlimited boycott would – in my opinion – achieve the opposite. It would push the Israeli public further into the arms of the extreme Right.
The struggle over the Goldstone report is now at its height. In Jerusalem, the rising energy of the waves can be clearly felt. Does this portend a tsunami?
permlink: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1255784867
data & Daily updated occupation related reading
http://www.kibush.co.il
http://www.btselem.org
http://www.ochaopt.org
If instead of daily looking at websites you prefer to receive a weekly selection by email
subscribe to TOI-Billboard
by writing in the subject line
"Send me TOI" to: mhtml:%7BAFAE16F9-BE05-4577-8087-8D08CA43582C%7Dmid://00000004/!x-usc:http://us.mc520.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=otherisr@actcom.co.il
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Most recent TOI-Billboard can be seen at:
http://toibillboard.info/index.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gush Shalom email address for correspondence, also if you want to (un)subscribe
correspondence @ gush - shalom . org
(without the spaces!)
Address for contributions:
GUSH SHALOM p.o.b. 3322 Tel Aviv 61033
www.gush-shalom.org
Truth / Правда / אמת / حقيقة
English website http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_en.html
Статьи Ури Авнери http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ru/avnery
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_he.html אתר בעברית
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ar/avnery اوري افنيري
Stop US tax money flowing to settlers
Gush Shalom approached the National Lawyers' Guild in the US, requesting NLG members to act against American organizations supporting Israeli settlers in the Occupied Territories and get the tax authorities to remove the tax exempt status presently given to donations to the settlers.
Read more: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/events/1256566250
~~~
Ad in Ha'aretz, Oct. 23, 20 09
?A SHAM
To hear testimonies
From soldiers and Gaza residentsIn public and in the presenceOf international observers... full text
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1256319739
~~~
Uri Avnery
Where Have All the Friendships GoneACCORDING TO a Chinese saying, if someone in the street tells you that you are drunk, you can laugh. If a second... Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
~~~
The ceaseless chatteringand more at Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
לעצור זרימת כספי מס אמריקאי למתנחלים
תנועת גוש שלום פנתה אל "אגודת עורכי הדין הלאומית" בארה"ב בבקשה שחברי האגודה יפעלו נגד אגודות התמיכה במתנחלים הפועלות בארה"ב ויביאו לביטול המעמד הפטור ממס שניתן כיום לתרומות הזורמות אל ההתנחלויות.
קראו עודhttp://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/events/1256566250
~~~
מודעה ב"הארץ"23 באוקטובר
כאילו?עדויותמחיילים ומתושבי עזה -בפומבי ובנוכחותמשקיפים בינלאומיים... טכסט מלא:
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad/1256319824
~~~
אורי אבנרי "איפה הידידים כולם..."פתגם סיני אומר שאם אדם אומר לך ברחוב שאתה שיכור, תצחק. אם אדם שני אומר לך שאתה שיכור, תתחיל לחשוש. אם אדם שלישי אומר... טכסט מלא http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1256493910
ארכיון מאמרים של אורי אבנרי
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
~~~
הכל דיבורים, הכל פטפוטים
ועוד בבלוג של אדם : http://adam-keller1.blogspot.com
Uri Avnery24.10.09
"Where Have All the Friendships Gone…"
ACCORDING TO a Chinese saying, if someone in the street tells you that you are drunk, you can laugh. If a second person tells you that you are drunk, start to think about it. If a third one tells you the same, go home and sleep it off.
Our political and military leadership has already encountered the third, fourth and fifth person. All of them say that they must investigate what happened in the "Molten Lead" operation.
They have three options:
to conduct a real investigation.
to ignore the demand and proceed as if nothing has happened.
to conduct a sham inquiry.
IT IS easy to dismiss the first option: it has not the slightest chance of being adopted. Except for the usual suspects (including myself) who demanded an investigation long before anyone in Israel had heard of a judge called Goldstone, nobody supports it.
Among all the members of our political, military and media establishments who are now suggesting an "inquiry", there is no one – literally not one – who means by that a real investigation. The aim is to deceive the Goyim and get them to shut up.
Actually, Israeli law lays down clear guidelines for such investigations. The government decides to set up a commission of investigation. The president of the Supreme Court then appoints the members of the commission. The commission can compel witnesses to testify. Anybody who may be damaged by its conclusions must be warned and given the opportunity to defend themself. Its conclusions are binding.
This law has an interesting history. Sometime in the 50s, David Ben-Gurion demanded the appointment of a "judicial committee of inquiry" to decide who gave the orders for the 1954 "security mishap", also known as the Lavon Affair. (A false flag operation where an espionage network composed of local Jews was activated to bomb American and British offices in Egypt, in order to cause friction between Egypt and the Western powers. The perpetrators were caught.)
Ben-Gurion’s request was denied, under the pretext that there was no law for such a procedure. Furious, Ben-Gurion resigned from the government and left his party. In one of the stormy party sessions, the Minister of Justice, Yaakov Shimshon Shapira, called Ben-Gurion a "fascist". But Shapira, an old Russian Jew, regretted his outburst later. He drafted a special law for the appointment of Commissions of Investigation in the future. After lengthy deliberations in the Knesset (in which I took an active part) the law was adopted and has since been applied, notably in the case of the Sabra and Shatila massacre.
Now I wholeheartedly support the setting up of a Commission of Investigation according to this law.
THE SECOND option is the one proposed by the army Chief of Staff and the Minister of Defense. In America it is called "stonewalling". Meaning: To hell with it.
The army commanders object to any investigation and any inquiry whatsoever. They probably know why. After all, they know the facts. They know that a dark shadow lies over the very decision to go to war, over the planning of the operation, over the instructions given to the troops, and over many dozens of large and small acts committed during the operation.
In their opinion, even if their refusal has severe international repercussions, the consequences of any investigation, even a phony one, would be far worse.
As long as the Chief of Staff sticks to this position, there will be no investigation outside the army, whatever the attitude of the ministers. The army chief, who attends every cabinet meeting, is the largest figure in the room. When he announces that such and such is the "position of the army", no mere politician present would dare to object.
In the "Only Democracy in the Middle East", the law (proposed at the time by Menachem Begin) stipulates that the Government as such is the Commander in Chief of the Israel Defense Forces. That is the theory. In practice, no decision at variance with the "position of the army" has ever been or will ever be adopted.
The army claims to be investigating itself. Ehud Barak represents – willingly or unwillingly – this position. The cabinet has postponed dealing with the matter, and that’s where things stand today.
ON THIS occasion, the spotlight should be turned on the least visible person in Israel: the Chief of the General Staff, Lieutenant General Gabi Ashkenazi, the ultimate Teflon-man. Nothing sticks to him. In this debate, as in all others, he just is not there.
Everybody knows that Ashkenazi is a shy and modest man. He hardly ever speaks, writes or speechifies. On television, he merges into the background.
This is how he looks to the public: an honest soldier, without tricks or ploys, who does his duty quietly, receives his orders from the government and fulfills them loyally. In this he differs from almost all his predecessors, who were boastful, publicity-crazy and loquacious. While most them came from famous elite units or the arrogant Air Force, he is a grey infantry man. The Duke of Wellington, seeing the huge amount of paperwork in his army, once exclaimed: "Soldiers should fight, not write!" He would have liked Ashkenazi
But reality is not always what it seems. Ashkenazi plays a central role in the decision-making process. He was appointed after his predecessor, Dan Halutz, resigned after the failures of Lebanon War II. Under Ashkenazi’s leadership, new doctrines were formulated and put into action in the "Molten Lead" operation. I defined them (on my own responsibility) as "Zero Losses" and "Better to kill a hundred enemy civilians than to lose one of our own soldiers". Since the Gaza war did not lead to a single soldier being put on trial, Ashkenazi must bear the responsibility for everything that happened there.
If an indictment were issued by the International Court in The Hague, Ashkenazi would probably be accorded the place of honor as "Defendant No. 1". No wonder that he objects to any outside investigation, as does Ehud Barak, who would probably occupy the No. 2 place.
THE POLITICIANS who oppose (ever so quietly) the Chief of Staff’s position believe that it is impossible to withstand international pressure completely, and that some kind of an inquiry will have to be conducted. Since not one of them intends to hold a real investigation, they propose to follow a tried and trusted Israeli method, which has worked wonderfully hundreds of times in the past: the method of sham.
A sham inquiry. Sham conclusions. Sham adherence to international law. Sham civilian control over the military.
Nothing simpler than that. An "inquiry committee" (but not a Commission of Investigation according to the law) will be set up, chaired by a suitably patriotic judge and composed of carefully chosen honorable citizens who are all "one of us". Testimonies will be heard behind closed doors (for considerations of security, of course). Army lawyers will prove that everything was perfectly legal, the National Whitewasher, Professor Asa Kasher, will laud the ethics of the Most Moral Army in the World. Generals will speak about our inalienable right to self-defense. In the end, two or three junior officers or privates may be found guilty of "irregularities".
Israel’s friends all over the world will break into an ecstatic chorus: What a lawful state! What a democracy! What morality! Western governments will declare that justice has been done and the case closed. The US veto will see to the rest.
So why don’t the army chiefs accept this proposal? Because they are afraid things might not proceed quite so smoothly. The international community will demand that at least part of the hearings be conducted in open court. There will be a demand for the presence of international observers. And, most importantly: there will be no justifiable way to exclude the testimonies of the Gazans themselves. Things will get complicated. The world will not accept fabricated conclusions. In the end we will be in exactly the same situation. Better to stay put and brave it out, whatever the price.
IN THE meantime, international pressure on Israel is increasing. Even now it has reached unprecedented proportions.
Russia and China have voted in favor of the endorsement of the Goldstone report by the UN. The UK and France "did not take part in the vote", but demanded that Israel conduct a real investigation. We have quarreled with Turkey, until now an important military ally. We have altercations with Sweden, Norway and a number of other friendly countries. The French Foreign Minister has been prevented from crossing into the Gaza Strip and is furious. The already cold peace with Egypt and Jordan has become several degrees colder. Israel is boycotted in many forums. Senior army officers are afraid to travel abroad for fear of arrest.
This raises the question once more: can outside pressure have an impact on Israel?
Certainly it can. The question is: what kind of pressure, what kind of impact?
The pressure has indeed convinced several ministers that an inquiry committee for the Goldstone report has to be set up. But no one in the Israeli establishment – no one at all! – has raised the real question: Perhaps Goldstone is right? Except for the usual suspects, no one in the media, the Knesset or the government has asked: Perhaps war crimes have indeed been committed? The outside pressure has not forced such questions to be raised. They must come from the inside, from the public itself.
The kind of pressure must also be considered. The Goldstone report has an impact on the world because it is precise and targeted: a specific operation, for which specific persons are responsible. It raises a specific demand: an investigation. It attacks a clear and well-defined target: war crimes.
If we apply this to the debate about boycotting Israel: the Goldstone report may be compared to a targeted boycott on the settlements and their helpers, not an unlimited boycott of the State of Israel. A targeted boycott can have a positive impact. A comprehensive, unlimited boycott would – in my opinion – achieve the opposite. It would push the Israeli public further into the arms of the extreme Right.
The struggle over the Goldstone report is now at its height. In Jerusalem, the rising energy of the waves can be clearly felt. Does this portend a tsunami?
permlink: http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1255784867
data & Daily updated occupation related reading
http://www.kibush.co.il
http://www.btselem.org
http://www.ochaopt.org
If instead of daily looking at websites you prefer to receive a weekly selection by email
subscribe to TOI-Billboard
by writing in the subject line
"Send me TOI" to: mhtml:%7BAFAE16F9-BE05-4577-8087-8D08CA43582C%7Dmid://00000004/!x-usc:http://us.mc520.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=otherisr@actcom.co.il
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Most recent TOI-Billboard can be seen at:
http://toibillboard.info/index.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gush Shalom email address for correspondence, also if you want to (un)subscribe
correspondence @ gush - shalom . org
(without the spaces!)
Address for contributions:
GUSH SHALOM p.o.b. 3322 Tel Aviv 61033
domingo, 18 de octubre de 2009
3 noticias de Gush Shalom
Gracias a Eduardo Mosches por el envío.
1) Ad in Ha'aretz, Oct. 16, 20 09
!INVESTIGATE
We must investigateThe suspectedGaza War crimes Not because of the UN,Not for fear of Goldstone,But for our... Read more
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1255708719
~~~
2) Uri Avnery
The Slippery Slope
IT IS, of course, all the fault of Judge Richard Goldstone. He is to blame for it, as he is to blame for all the... Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
~~~
3) Those nasty Turks
at Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
Más en:
www.gush-shalom.orgTruth / Правда / אמת / حقيقةEnglish website http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_en.htmlСтатьи Ури Авнери http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ru/avneryhttp://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_he.html אתר בעבריתhttp://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ar/avnery اوري افنيري
1) Ad in Ha'aretz, Oct. 16, 20 09
!INVESTIGATE
We must investigateThe suspectedGaza War crimes Not because of the UN,Not for fear of Goldstone,But for our... Read more
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1255708719
~~~
2) Uri Avnery
The Slippery Slope
IT IS, of course, all the fault of Judge Richard Goldstone. He is to blame for it, as he is to blame for all the... Full English text in the end
Avnery columns' archive http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
~~~
3) Those nasty Turks
at Adam's blog: http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com
Más en:
www.gush-shalom.orgTruth / Правда / אמת / حقيقةEnglish website http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_en.htmlСтатьи Ури Авнери http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ru/avneryhttp://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_he.html אתר בעבריתhttp://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/ar/avnery اوري افنيري
jueves, 15 de octubre de 2009
¿Antecedente de Waltz con Bachir?
Palestine is a graphic novel written and drawn by Joe Sacco about his experiences in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in December 1991 and January 1992. Sacco gives a portrayal which emphasizes the history and plight of the Palestinian people, as a group and as individuals.
The book takes place over a two-month period in late 1991 early 1992, with occasional flashbacks to the expulsion of the Arabs, the beginning of the Intifada, the Gulf War and other events in the more immediate past. Sacco spent this time meeting with Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and the narrative focuses on the minute details of everyday life in the occupied territories, presenting the daily struggles, humiliations and frustrations of the Palestinians.
The graphic novel, published in 2001 by Fantagraphics Books, is an assembly of nine stories first published in comic form in 1993; the single volume edition includes an introduction by Edward Said. In 1996, the comic was awarded the American Book Award by the Before Columbus Foundation.
How do you respond to critics who argue that your work cannot be considered journalism because of its artistic dimension?
It's perfectly valid to argue against what I do and wonder whether it can be considered journalistic. I describe my work as comic journalism, other people call it documentary journalism, but these are all just labels to me. The fact is that no one can tell an entire story, everyone concentrates on what they want to, details are cropped out of photographs, stories go through an editing process. Every portrayal is to some extent a filter, and on that level something that someone might find problematic. Ultimately, I try to be as accurate when putting down quotations and describing things. I'm not making things up even though there is an interpretive element to my work.
The book takes place over a two-month period in late 1991 early 1992, with occasional flashbacks to the expulsion of the Arabs, the beginning of the Intifada, the Gulf War and other events in the more immediate past. Sacco spent this time meeting with Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and the narrative focuses on the minute details of everyday life in the occupied territories, presenting the daily struggles, humiliations and frustrations of the Palestinians.
The graphic novel, published in 2001 by Fantagraphics Books, is an assembly of nine stories first published in comic form in 1993; the single volume edition includes an introduction by Edward Said. In 1996, the comic was awarded the American Book Award by the Before Columbus Foundation.
How do you respond to critics who argue that your work cannot be considered journalism because of its artistic dimension?
It's perfectly valid to argue against what I do and wonder whether it can be considered journalistic. I describe my work as comic journalism, other people call it documentary journalism, but these are all just labels to me. The fact is that no one can tell an entire story, everyone concentrates on what they want to, details are cropped out of photographs, stories go through an editing process. Every portrayal is to some extent a filter, and on that level something that someone might find problematic. Ultimately, I try to be as accurate when putting down quotations and describing things. I'm not making things up even though there is an interpretive element to my work.
Pide B’Tselem el fin de prisión a palestinos
Pide B’Tselem el fin de prisión a palestinos
Dpa
Jerusalén. La organización israelí de defensa de los derechos humanos B’Tselem llamó al gobierno de su país a poner fin a la práctica de encarcelar sin juicio a palestinos supuestamente involucrados en actividades extremistas, por periodos prorrogables de hasta seis meses. El organismo humanitario estimó que al menos 335 palestinos se encuentran en esta situación. Mientras, Israel, amenazó con no retomar las negociaciones con los palestinos hasta que Naciones Unidas retire el informe Goldstone, que acusa a su ejército, pero también al grupo palestino Hamas, de cometer crímenes de guerra en la ofensiva militar israelí de diciembre y enero. Fatah, el partido del presidente palestino Mahmoud Abbas, aceptó la propuesta egipcia de reconciliación con Hamas, que aún estudia el plan, mientras un palestino murió en un ataque israelí de túneles entre la franja de Gaza y Egipto.
(Tomado de La Jornada de hoy)
Más información de esta ONG en: http://www.btselem.org/English/
La nota completa en hebreo: http://www.btselem.org/hebrew/Publications/Summaries/200910_Without_Trial.asp
Dpa
Jerusalén. La organización israelí de defensa de los derechos humanos B’Tselem llamó al gobierno de su país a poner fin a la práctica de encarcelar sin juicio a palestinos supuestamente involucrados en actividades extremistas, por periodos prorrogables de hasta seis meses. El organismo humanitario estimó que al menos 335 palestinos se encuentran en esta situación. Mientras, Israel, amenazó con no retomar las negociaciones con los palestinos hasta que Naciones Unidas retire el informe Goldstone, que acusa a su ejército, pero también al grupo palestino Hamas, de cometer crímenes de guerra en la ofensiva militar israelí de diciembre y enero. Fatah, el partido del presidente palestino Mahmoud Abbas, aceptó la propuesta egipcia de reconciliación con Hamas, que aún estudia el plan, mientras un palestino murió en un ataque israelí de túneles entre la franja de Gaza y Egipto.
(Tomado de La Jornada de hoy)
Más información de esta ONG en: http://www.btselem.org/English/
La nota completa en hebreo: http://www.btselem.org/hebrew/Publications/Summaries/200910_Without_Trial.asp
domingo, 4 de octubre de 2009
Lunes 12 de octubre, 17 hrs. - Presentación del libro de Martin Buber "Una tierra para dos pueblos"
Este libro contiene textos políticos del filósofo Martin Buber (1878-1965), escritos entre 1918-1965 sobre la cuestión israelí - palestina. La selección y edición estuvo a cargo de Paul Mendes-Flohr. Se trata de un libro de sorprendente actualidad, coeditado por IIFL,UNAM y editorial Sígueme, Salamanca, 2009.
Lunes 12 de octubre de 2009, 17 hrs., Salón de Actos de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la UNAM.
sábado, 3 de octubre de 2009
martes, 29 de septiembre de 2009
"Vals con Bashir": hoy a las 19 hrs. última película de "¿Paz o pax en Medio Oriente?"
Martes 29/9 a las 19 hrs. en la sala Julio Bracho del Centro Cultural Universitario para ver Vals con Bashir, Comentan Carmen Aristegui, Rafael Barajas El Fisgón y Marcos Límenes. Modera Pedro Miguel.
Otro gran ejerccicio de memoria y testimonio en lengua hebrea no desde el lugar de la víctima sino del victimario. Aquí la ficción veraz de la animación se presta para un dolorosísimo proceso testimonial de responsabilidad para con el otro: el otro que deja la animación para aparecer en imagen documental exigiendo justicia.
Es cierto que el cine conmueve, Aristegui dijo que "no necesariamente nos permite entender" y es cierto: si la comprensión se entiende en sentido estricto, no es suficiente para entender. El cine narra. Y se trata de una narración que es ficción veraz, como dice Benjamin, autor de "El narrador" en tanto no se presenta como cúmulo de información sino como transmisión de experiencia.
En este ciclo aprendimos y comprendimos el miedo, el dolor y la humanidad de los protagonistas de una escalada de odio que fue montada y que por lo tanto es posible y necesario, con paciencia y responsabildad, desmontar. Este ciclo (y el que lo seguirá en 2010) tienen la esperanza de que la razón ética y la imaginativa que se despiertan frente a la pantalla nos ayuden en ese desmontaje. El cine hoy está pudiendo ver y hacer ver otros aspectos que los trabajos académicos no alcanzan a teorizar. Se trata de un lenguaje que puede decir mucho más que lo que la academia quiere decir. La razón ética puede ofrecese como una línea de fuga ante el impasse al que conduce a los pueblos la palabra mendaz de la Realpolitik.
Otro gran ejerccicio de memoria y testimonio en lengua hebrea no desde el lugar de la víctima sino del victimario. Aquí la ficción veraz de la animación se presta para un dolorosísimo proceso testimonial de responsabilidad para con el otro: el otro que deja la animación para aparecer en imagen documental exigiendo justicia.
Es cierto que el cine conmueve, Aristegui dijo que "no necesariamente nos permite entender" y es cierto: si la comprensión se entiende en sentido estricto, no es suficiente para entender. El cine narra. Y se trata de una narración que es ficción veraz, como dice Benjamin, autor de "El narrador" en tanto no se presenta como cúmulo de información sino como transmisión de experiencia.
En este ciclo aprendimos y comprendimos el miedo, el dolor y la humanidad de los protagonistas de una escalada de odio que fue montada y que por lo tanto es posible y necesario, con paciencia y responsabildad, desmontar. Este ciclo (y el que lo seguirá en 2010) tienen la esperanza de que la razón ética y la imaginativa que se despiertan frente a la pantalla nos ayuden en ese desmontaje. El cine hoy está pudiendo ver y hacer ver otros aspectos que los trabajos académicos no alcanzan a teorizar. Se trata de un lenguaje que puede decir mucho más que lo que la academia quiere decir. La razón ética puede ofrecese como una línea de fuga ante el impasse al que conduce a los pueblos la palabra mendaz de la Realpolitik.
viernes, 25 de septiembre de 2009
Uri Avnery "El drama y la farsa"- Noticias de Gush Shalom
Gracias a Eduardo Mosches por el envío
Uri Avnery en inglés - The Drama and the Farce
Full English text in the end Avnery columns' archive http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
Uri Avnery en hebreo - אורי אבנרי הדרמה והפארסהטכסט מלא http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1253719848ארכיון מאמרים של אורי אבנרי http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
Noticias de Gush Shalom
De Occupation Magazine, protesta este sábado 26/9 contra la falta de agua al sur del monte Hebron
BREAKING THE THIRST Water convoy to villages in South- Hebron Hills, Saturday, 26.9
http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=35763
N.B. See Dorit Jordan Dotan's photos - at an earlier point of this campaign http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/archive/1253534229
שיירת מים לכפרים בדרום הר חברון - שבת 26.9 בואו להשתתף במחאה על מצוקת המים http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=35765 ראו הצילומים של דורית יורדן דותן בשלב מוקדם יותר של המסע הזה http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/archive/1253532984
Aviso en Ha'aretz, Sep. 25, 20 09
THE PRICE Netanyahu Has won
No settlement Freeze
Full text
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1253792927
מודעה ב"הארץ"25 בספטמבר
המחיר נתניהו הצליח:אין הקפאהשל ההתנחלויות
קראו עוד:
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad/1253793159
~~~
Uri Avnery en inglés - The Drama and the Farce
Full English text in the end Avnery columns' archive http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery
Uri Avnery en hebreo - אורי אבנרי הדרמה והפארסהטכסט מלא http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery/1253719848ארכיון מאמרים של אורי אבנרי http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/avnery
Noticias de Gush Shalom
De Occupation Magazine, protesta este sábado 26/9 contra la falta de agua al sur del monte Hebron
BREAKING THE THIRST Water convoy to villages in South- Hebron Hills, Saturday, 26.9
http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=35763
N.B. See Dorit Jordan Dotan's photos - at an earlier point of this campaign http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/archive/1253534229
שיירת מים לכפרים בדרום הר חברון - שבת 26.9 בואו להשתתף במחאה על מצוקת המים http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=35765 ראו הצילומים של דורית יורדן דותן בשלב מוקדם יותר של המסע הזה http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/archive/1253532984
Aviso en Ha'aretz, Sep. 25, 20 09
THE PRICE Netanyahu Has won
No settlement Freeze
Full text
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/weekly_ad/1253792927
מודעה ב"הארץ"25 בספטמבר
המחיר נתניהו הצליח:אין הקפאהשל ההתנחלויות
קראו עוד:
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/he/channels/weekly_ad/1253793159
~~~
Z 32, para seguir el debate
Z 32 – Avi Mograbi
Ya casi tocando fin el ciclo de cine “Paz o pax en Medio Oriente”, quisiera seguir la discusión sobre la película Z 32 comentando algunos puntos que me parecen importantes y ojalá podamos continuar el debate en el blog. Lanzo entonces algunas cosas que me vienen a la mente:
1- Ante todo, es bueno saber que el video que empieza y termina la película (el del soldado y su novia) fue hecho por ellos y se lo llevaron al director para que los ayude a hacer de eso un documental. El chico, luego de haber pertenecido a una unidad “de élite” del ejército, como muchos otros, decide “romper el silencio” (shovrim shtikah se llama la ONG que recoge esos testimonios y que da el número del archivo, título de la película). Esta ONG últimamente aparece en los periódicos documentando la banalidad del mal (el asunto de las playeras que se puede leer en este blog, y otras confesiones más). Porque fueron ellos quienes buscaron al director, se entiende la duda de éste acerca de la moralidad de hacerlo.
2- El testimonio del joven, con el lenguaje quebrado que lo caracteriza, en este caso tiene una particularidad (compartida con la película que cierra el ciclo: Vals con Bashir) y es que un pueblo acostumbrado a testimoniar desde el lugar de la víctima, esta vez se presente a testimoniar en tanto victimario. La lengua quebrada es el hebreo “renacido” en el siglo XX, utilizado de manera instrumental. Vale la pena repetirlo: la chica forma parte del 50% de los jóvenes israelíes que por diversas causas no se enrolaron en el ejército, en el caso de ella, es claro que por objeción de conciencia. Eso se manifiesta en su dificultad para reproducir el lenguaje militar y en su cuestionamiento de las acciones del novio.
3-La función moral de las mujeres en la película: por un lado la novia del soldado que es a quien él le pide “mejilah” (absolución), un término del campo religioso que no se usa en el lenguaje cotidiano, no es “perdón” lo que le ruega, es mucho más que eso. Por otra parte, la mujer del director, que cuestiona la moralidad de él al hacer esta película, en las canciones dice: “Ella dice:/“No es material para una película”/“Él actúa el papel del arrepentido/Y tú aparentemente sólo observas/Él purga a través de ti/Y tú vas a arañar de esto otra película fuerte./Entonces deja de flirtear con el mal/Porque tú y él no están en el mismo barco/ /Y promete que no vas a filmarlo/Acá, en la sala./Ella dice/“No es material para una película”
4-Uno de los temas importantísimos que sugiere la película es la complicidad de los padres que necesitan que el hijo guarde silencio (ellos no apoyan a la ONG “breaking the silence”). En general, salvo honrosas excepciones, ellos se enorgullecen de que sus hijos sean elegidos para misiones secretas del ejército y obedecen al secreto sacrificando la ética a la complicidad militar-nacionalista. Esto queda claro en la parte musical del director, que hace deslizar las canciones infantiles al lenguaje militar, como pasa con una conocidísima canción de Jaim Najman Bialik sobre el caballito (poeta al que por cierto le tomaron de un verso de una canción de jánuca el título de la ofensiva a Gaza: “oferet yetzukah”, plomo fundido o endurecido según la traducción): “Es una historia sobre uno, un soldado/Él fue educado e incorporó el hecho de pertenecer a los mejores hijos/Fue cultivado para esperar/Que sólo le permitan/Le dejen alguna vez asaltar/ Que le dejen marearse un poquito/Dentro de poco se daría de baja, pues le dijeron /¡adelante! “corre y glopa”/“corre en el valle, corre en la montaña” (a color está la letra de la canción infantil)
Además, eso queda claro cuando él canta que le cubre la cara también porque ese chico es un hijo modelo para sus padres (no sólo para protegerlo de la posible venganza de los agraviados): "Oculten su rostro/Para que podamos/Seguir e imaginarlo/Déjenle un agujero a la nariz/Y a sus dos ojos/Que sintamos su sonrisa/Que no hay en él nada de maldad/Que es el hijo modelo,/Obviamente para sus padres/Oculten su rostro/Oculten su rostro”.
Llama la atención que se condene al “útero musulmán” (como lo llama Nurit Peled) por producir suicidas, ¿qué se puede decir del “útero judío”? ¿produce tal vez sansones , o filisteos? Sin duda, hay otras razones que hacen que la gente se ame en diversas lenguas y creencias y albergue hijos en vientres maternos. ¿Por qué siempre ver la paja en el ojo ajeno?
5- La enigmática respuesta que el soldado da a su novia a la pregunta acerca del sentimiento de culpa “no en el sentido clásico del término” causa en un primer momento una comprensible indignación moral. Sin embargo, en un segundo momento, da la sensación de que este sentimiento de culpabilidad es diferente pero no deja de ser tal. Por mi parte, me dice algo así como que los valores morales clásicos no alcanzan para pensar la banalidad del mal (en el sentido de Arendt), porque en el fondo son cómplices de ella. Él tiene conciencia de lo que reprime en sueños y de sus negaciones, no está orgulloso ni feliz de lo que hace, no soporta su angustia y por eso confiesa y hace la película, no olvida la cara del muerto, y va al lugar de los hechos y ruega a su novia y al director...
6- Por último, la valentía de Mograbi de llamar a las cosas por su nombre, en este caso, invocar la justicia que el ejército trata de postergar y relegar. Otra vez las canciones: “Con todas mis intenciones/Cuando no hay una mesa para golpear/Cuando no hay un tribunal al que dirigirse/En lugar de sacarse de encima eso/En lugar de simplemente entregarlo/A quien lo encarcele/Yo voy y canto sobre esto”. A eso se refería el comentarista Lev Grinberg al invocar el tribunal de La Haya.
Como solía decir mi abuelo: me saco el sombrero ante esta excelente película.
Silvana Rabinovich
Ya casi tocando fin el ciclo de cine “Paz o pax en Medio Oriente”, quisiera seguir la discusión sobre la película Z 32 comentando algunos puntos que me parecen importantes y ojalá podamos continuar el debate en el blog. Lanzo entonces algunas cosas que me vienen a la mente:
1- Ante todo, es bueno saber que el video que empieza y termina la película (el del soldado y su novia) fue hecho por ellos y se lo llevaron al director para que los ayude a hacer de eso un documental. El chico, luego de haber pertenecido a una unidad “de élite” del ejército, como muchos otros, decide “romper el silencio” (shovrim shtikah se llama la ONG que recoge esos testimonios y que da el número del archivo, título de la película). Esta ONG últimamente aparece en los periódicos documentando la banalidad del mal (el asunto de las playeras que se puede leer en este blog, y otras confesiones más). Porque fueron ellos quienes buscaron al director, se entiende la duda de éste acerca de la moralidad de hacerlo.
2- El testimonio del joven, con el lenguaje quebrado que lo caracteriza, en este caso tiene una particularidad (compartida con la película que cierra el ciclo: Vals con Bashir) y es que un pueblo acostumbrado a testimoniar desde el lugar de la víctima, esta vez se presente a testimoniar en tanto victimario. La lengua quebrada es el hebreo “renacido” en el siglo XX, utilizado de manera instrumental. Vale la pena repetirlo: la chica forma parte del 50% de los jóvenes israelíes que por diversas causas no se enrolaron en el ejército, en el caso de ella, es claro que por objeción de conciencia. Eso se manifiesta en su dificultad para reproducir el lenguaje militar y en su cuestionamiento de las acciones del novio.
3-La función moral de las mujeres en la película: por un lado la novia del soldado que es a quien él le pide “mejilah” (absolución), un término del campo religioso que no se usa en el lenguaje cotidiano, no es “perdón” lo que le ruega, es mucho más que eso. Por otra parte, la mujer del director, que cuestiona la moralidad de él al hacer esta película, en las canciones dice: “Ella dice:/“No es material para una película”/“Él actúa el papel del arrepentido/Y tú aparentemente sólo observas/Él purga a través de ti/Y tú vas a arañar de esto otra película fuerte./Entonces deja de flirtear con el mal/Porque tú y él no están en el mismo barco/ /Y promete que no vas a filmarlo/Acá, en la sala./Ella dice/“No es material para una película”
4-Uno de los temas importantísimos que sugiere la película es la complicidad de los padres que necesitan que el hijo guarde silencio (ellos no apoyan a la ONG “breaking the silence”). En general, salvo honrosas excepciones, ellos se enorgullecen de que sus hijos sean elegidos para misiones secretas del ejército y obedecen al secreto sacrificando la ética a la complicidad militar-nacionalista. Esto queda claro en la parte musical del director, que hace deslizar las canciones infantiles al lenguaje militar, como pasa con una conocidísima canción de Jaim Najman Bialik sobre el caballito (poeta al que por cierto le tomaron de un verso de una canción de jánuca el título de la ofensiva a Gaza: “oferet yetzukah”, plomo fundido o endurecido según la traducción): “Es una historia sobre uno, un soldado/Él fue educado e incorporó el hecho de pertenecer a los mejores hijos/Fue cultivado para esperar/Que sólo le permitan/Le dejen alguna vez asaltar/ Que le dejen marearse un poquito/Dentro de poco se daría de baja, pues le dijeron /¡adelante! “corre y glopa”/“corre en el valle, corre en la montaña” (a color está la letra de la canción infantil)
Además, eso queda claro cuando él canta que le cubre la cara también porque ese chico es un hijo modelo para sus padres (no sólo para protegerlo de la posible venganza de los agraviados): "Oculten su rostro/Para que podamos/Seguir e imaginarlo/Déjenle un agujero a la nariz/Y a sus dos ojos/Que sintamos su sonrisa/Que no hay en él nada de maldad/Que es el hijo modelo,/Obviamente para sus padres/Oculten su rostro/Oculten su rostro”.
Llama la atención que se condene al “útero musulmán” (como lo llama Nurit Peled) por producir suicidas, ¿qué se puede decir del “útero judío”? ¿produce tal vez sansones , o filisteos? Sin duda, hay otras razones que hacen que la gente se ame en diversas lenguas y creencias y albergue hijos en vientres maternos. ¿Por qué siempre ver la paja en el ojo ajeno?
5- La enigmática respuesta que el soldado da a su novia a la pregunta acerca del sentimiento de culpa “no en el sentido clásico del término” causa en un primer momento una comprensible indignación moral. Sin embargo, en un segundo momento, da la sensación de que este sentimiento de culpabilidad es diferente pero no deja de ser tal. Por mi parte, me dice algo así como que los valores morales clásicos no alcanzan para pensar la banalidad del mal (en el sentido de Arendt), porque en el fondo son cómplices de ella. Él tiene conciencia de lo que reprime en sueños y de sus negaciones, no está orgulloso ni feliz de lo que hace, no soporta su angustia y por eso confiesa y hace la película, no olvida la cara del muerto, y va al lugar de los hechos y ruega a su novia y al director...
6- Por último, la valentía de Mograbi de llamar a las cosas por su nombre, en este caso, invocar la justicia que el ejército trata de postergar y relegar. Otra vez las canciones: “Con todas mis intenciones/Cuando no hay una mesa para golpear/Cuando no hay un tribunal al que dirigirse/En lugar de sacarse de encima eso/En lugar de simplemente entregarlo/A quien lo encarcele/Yo voy y canto sobre esto”. A eso se refería el comentarista Lev Grinberg al invocar el tribunal de La Haya.
Como solía decir mi abuelo: me saco el sombrero ante esta excelente película.
Silvana Rabinovich
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)
